Skip to content

Update documentation for ImplicitUsings element - #13900

Merged
JanProvaznik merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
dev/drnoakes/xsd-implicit-usings-false
Jun 3, 2026
Merged

Update documentation for ImplicitUsings element#13900
JanProvaznik merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
dev/drnoakes/xsd-implicit-usings-false

Conversation

@drewnoakes

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 29, 2026 04:25

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates the XSD IntelliSense schema for the ImplicitUsings MSBuild property to include false as a valid value, matching the documented behavior on Microsoft Learn.

Changes:

  • Add <xs:enumeration value="false" /> to the ImplicitUsings restriction.
  • Update the documentation string to mention false as a possible value.

@github-actions github-actions Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✅ 24/24 dimensions clean — no findings.

This is a straightforward, correct documentation fix. The XSD schema was missing the false enumeration value for ImplicitUsings, which is a documented valid option per the [official Microsoft docs]((learn.microsoft.com/redacted) The change is purely additive (non-breaking), well-scoped, and aligns the IntelliSense schema with actual SDK behavior.

Generated by Expert Code Review (on open) for issue #13900 · ● 860.7K

@JanProvaznik
JanProvaznik merged commit f69fa2f into main Jun 3, 2026
17 checks passed
@JanProvaznik
JanProvaznik deleted the dev/drnoakes/xsd-implicit-usings-false branch June 3, 2026 12:35
This was referenced Aug 11, 2026
This was referenced Aug 19, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants