Skip to content

Conversation

@pawelrutkaq
Copy link

Use qor-runtime to implement FEO

@pawelrutkaq pawelrutkaq force-pushed the pawelrutkaq_runtime branch from de4c221 to a512828 Compare April 9, 2025 06:05
Use qor-runtime to implement FEO

Signed-off-by: Pawel Rutka <pawel.rutka.ext@qorix.ai>
@pawelrutkaq pawelrutkaq force-pushed the pawelrutkaq_runtime branch from a512828 to 93938b6 Compare April 9, 2025 06:09
hanky-qorix
hanky-qorix approved these changes Apr 9, 2025
@hanky-qorix hanky-qorix requested review from hanky-qorix and removed request for hanky-qorix April 9, 2025 13:46
@pawelrutkaq pawelrutkaq requested a review from hanky-qorix April 9, 2025 13:56
@pawelrutkaq pawelrutkaq marked this pull request as draft April 9, 2025 13:56
@pawelrutkaq
Copy link
Author

pawelrutkaq commented Apr 9, 2025

Left as a draf so it's not merged - but can be used for testing ;)

pawelrutkaq and others added 2 commits April 17, 2025 20:17
Increase readability and structure
@armin-acn
Copy link
Contributor

armin-acn commented May 5, 2025

With PR #39 ("FEO Prototype improvements") a configurable benchmark for the FEO cycle time overhead has been introduced in the ESR Labs Contribution request.

For comparison, I have created draft code implementing a similar benchmark based on the current state of the Qorix contribution request: #40

A few results and comments can be found here: 2025-04-23_FEO_Contribution_Requests.pdf

@FScholPer
Copy link

Do we still need that draft?

@pawelrutkaq
Copy link
Author

Let me keep it for a moment still. I want to do porting on newest FEO and SCORE Orchestrator.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants