Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix method names and qa in vertical #38

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 21, 2025

Conversation

sandorkertesz
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.68%. Comparing base (a593136) to head (35a86d3).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop      #38   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    98.68%   98.68%           
========================================
  Files            8        8           
  Lines          684      684           
  Branches        26       26           
========================================
  Hits           675      675           
  Misses           7        7           
  Partials         2        2           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@sandorkertesz sandorkertesz changed the title Fix methods names and qa in vertical Fix methodsnames and qa in vertical Mar 21, 2025
@sandorkertesz sandorkertesz changed the title Fix methodsnames and qa in vertical Fix method names and qa in vertical Mar 21, 2025
@sandorkertesz sandorkertesz merged commit 64aa200 into develop Mar 21, 2025
109 checks passed
@sandorkertesz sandorkertesz deleted the feature/fix-method-names-and-qa-in-vertical branch March 21, 2025 08:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants