Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Hotfix/1.11.10 #46

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 10, 2024
Merged

Hotfix/1.11.10 #46

merged 3 commits into from
Apr 10, 2024

Conversation

danovaro
Copy link
Member

@danovaro danovaro commented Apr 8, 2024

added support for to-by for stepRanges
step=0-6/to/18-24/by/6 ==> 0-6/6-12/12-18/18-24

@danovaro danovaro requested a review from simondsmart April 8, 2024 15:16
step("0/to/6/by/30m", "0/30m/1/1h30m/2/2h30m/3/3h30m/4/4h30m/5/5h30m/6");
step("0-6/to/18-24/by/6", "0-6/6-12/12-18/18-24");
step("0-24/to/48-72/by/24", "0-24/24-48/48-72");
step("0/to/24/by/3/0-6/to/18-24/by/6", "0/3/6/9/12/15/18/21/24/0-6/6-12/12-18/18-24");
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we make sure there is a test here testing the ranges with the by syntax using e.g.

0-24/to/48-72/by/90m

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks, added!

@@ -102,7 +102,8 @@ void StepRange::print(std::ostream& s) const
eckit::Time t{static_cast<long>(to_*3600.), true};

TimeUnit unit = std::min(maxUnit(f), maxUnit(t));
s << canonical(f, unit) << '-' << canonical(t, unit);
// s << canonical(f, unit) << '-' << canonical(t, unit);
s << canonical(f) << '-' << canonical(t);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why are we no longer using unit here?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the initial request was to use the same unit for stepranges,
so 30m-1h ==> 30m-60m

with the to-by, we have horrible sequences:
0-6/to/3-9/by/30m ==> 0-6/30m-390m/1-7/90m-450m/2-8/150m-510m/3-9
with the proposed change we have:
0-6/to/3-9/by/30m ==> 0-6/30m-6h30m/1-7/1h30m-7h30m/2-8/2h30m-8h30m/3-9

@simondsmart
Copy link
Contributor

You need to address why the tests aren't passing ...

@danovaro danovaro merged commit 03aff1f into develop Apr 10, 2024
54 checks passed
@danovaro danovaro deleted the hotfix/1.11.10 branch April 10, 2024 12:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants