Skip to content

Conversation

@javanna
Copy link
Member

@javanna javanna commented Oct 29, 2025

We recently introduced metrics attributs to track search latencies at the shard and coord level.

With #137196 we are introducing such attributes to the can match phase latency metrics. The time range filter is not currently accessible when recording the metrics. This commit exposes it.

We recently introduced metrics attributs to track search latencies at the
shard and coord level.

With elastic#137196 we are introducing such attributes to the can match phase latency
metrics. The time range filter is not currently accessible when recording the
metrics. This commit exposes it.
@javanna javanna added :Search Foundations/Search Catch all for Search Foundations >refactoring labels Oct 29, 2025
@javanna javanna marked this pull request as ready for review October 29, 2025 19:42
@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-search-foundations (Team:Search Foundations)

@elasticsearchmachine elasticsearchmachine added the Team:Search Foundations Meta label for the Search Foundations team in Elasticsearch label Oct 29, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@chrisparrinello chrisparrinello left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@javanna javanna merged commit 9aed5f4 into elastic:main Oct 30, 2025
34 checks passed
@javanna javanna deleted the refactoring/can_match_time_range branch October 30, 2025 15:02
Copy link
Contributor

@andreidan andreidan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very late to the party but LGTM too

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

>refactoring :Search Foundations/Search Catch all for Search Foundations Team:Search Foundations Meta label for the Search Foundations team in Elasticsearch v9.3.0

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants