Skip to content

Concept example for semantic conventions registry inside of an integration #14343

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

smith
Copy link
Contributor

@smith smith commented Jun 27, 2025

What if we put a semantic conventions registry inside an integration?

Kibana could have access to the semantic conventions defined in upstream registries combined with ones defined in integrations.

Integrations that use ECS fields could define these as semconv attributes and metrics in their respective registries.

The example in this PR is as simple as possible, since all of the conventions defined here come from the import from OpenTelemetry semantic conventions.

smith added 4 commits June 26, 2025 22:39
…an up registry

- Updated all registry files to use OpenTelemetry semantic conventions v1.34.0
- Fixed registry_manifest.yaml to follow proper Weaver format with metadata and dependencies
- Removed custom groups from registry.yaml, keeping only imports for pure standards compliance
- Updated documentation to reflect import-only approach and latest OTel version
@elasticmachine
Copy link

elasticmachine commented Jun 27, 2025

💔 Build Failed

Failed CI Steps

History

@andrewkroh andrewkroh added the Integration:docker_otel Docker OpenTelemetry Assets label Jun 27, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Integration:docker_otel Docker OpenTelemetry Assets
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants