Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

web: Graphology node drag'n'drop #1236

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 25, 2025
Merged

web: Graphology node drag'n'drop #1236

merged 3 commits into from
Mar 25, 2025

Conversation

vorburger
Copy link
Member

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello @vorburger, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

Summary of Changes

This pull request introduces drag-and-drop functionality for nodes in the graphology visualization. It updates the bun version in .tool-versions from 1.2.4 to 1.2.6, removes the 'Let users drag nodes around' item from ToDo.md, and implements the drag-and-drop feature in web/src/browser/index.ts. The implementation involves event listeners for 'downNode', 'moveBody', 'upNode', and 'upStage' events on the Sigma.js renderer to handle the dragging state and update node positions.

Highlights

  • Drag and Drop Implementation: Implements node drag-and-drop functionality using Sigma.js events.
  • State Management: Introduces state variables draggedNode and isDragging to manage the drag-and-drop interaction.
  • Event Handling: Adds event listeners to handle mouse down, move, and up events for node dragging.
  • Layout Management: Stops the ForceAtlas2 layout during dragging to prevent conflicts between manual and automatic repositioning.

Changelog

  • .tool-versions
    • Updated bun version from 1.2.4 to 1.2.6.
  • web/ToDo.md
    • Removed the 'Let users drag nodes around' item from the ToDo list.
  • web/src/browser/index.ts
    • Added node size initialization.
    • Implemented drag-and-drop functionality for nodes.
    • Added event listeners for 'downNode', 'moveBody', 'upNode', and 'upStage' events.
    • Introduced state variables draggedNode and isDragging.
    • Stopped ForceAtlas2 layout during dragging.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with πŸ‘ and πŸ‘Ž on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.


Did you know?

The first graphical computer game was 'Tennis for Two', created in 1958 by William Higinbotham. It was displayed on an oscilloscope.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces node dragging functionality to the graphology visualization, which is a useful interactive feature. The implementation appears well-structured, using event listeners to manage the dragging state and update node positions. However, there are a few areas that could be improved for clarity and robustness.

Summary of Findings

  • Potential memory leak with event listeners: The event listeners added to the renderer might not be properly removed when the component is unmounted or the graph is destroyed, potentially leading to memory leaks. Consider adding a mechanism to remove these listeners when they are no longer needed.
  • Custom BBox handling: The logic for setting the custom BBox seems a bit unclear. It's only set if it's not already set, but it's not clear when it would be cleared. This could lead to unexpected behavior if the graph's dimensions change.

Merge Readiness

The pull request introduces a valuable feature and is generally well-implemented. However, addressing the potential memory leak with event listeners and clarifying the custom BBox handling would improve the code's robustness and maintainability. I recommend addressing these points before merging. I am unable to directly approve the pull request, and users should have others review and approve this code before merging.

Comment on lines 78 to 120
renderer.on("downNode", e => {
// On mouse down on a node:
// - Stop layout-ing (required; otherwise manual and automatic re-positioning "compete")
// - Enable the drag mode
// - Save in the dragged node in the state
// - Highlight the node
// - Disable the camera so its state is not updated
fa2Layout.stop()
isDragging = true
draggedNode = e.node
graph.setNodeAttribute(draggedNode, "highlighted", true)
if (!renderer.getCustomBBox()) renderer.setCustomBBox(renderer.getBBox())
})
renderer.on("moveBody", ({ event }) => {
// On mouse move, if the drag mode is enabled, we change the position of the draggedNode
if (!isDragging || !draggedNode) return

// Get new position of node
const pos = renderer.viewportToGraph(event)

graph.setNodeAttribute(draggedNode, "x", pos.x)
graph.setNodeAttribute(draggedNode, "y", pos.y)

// Prevent sigma to move camera:
event.preventSigmaDefault()
event.original.preventDefault()
event.original.stopPropagation()
})
const handleUp = () => {
// On mouse up, we reset the dragging mode
if (draggedNode) {
graph.removeNodeAttribute(draggedNode, "highlighted")
}
isDragging = false
draggedNode = null
}
renderer.on("upNode", handleUp)
renderer.on("upStage", handleUp)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

These event listeners are added to the renderer instance, but it's not clear if they are ever removed. If the component that contains this code is unmounted or the graph is destroyed, these listeners will continue to exist, potentially leading to memory leaks. Consider adding a mechanism to remove these listeners when they are no longer needed, such as using renderer.off() in a cleanup function.

isDragging = true
draggedNode = e.node
graph.setNodeAttribute(draggedNode, "highlighted", true)
if (!renderer.getCustomBBox()) renderer.setCustomBBox(renderer.getBBox())
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

It's unclear when renderer.getCustomBBox() would return a value, and thus when the custom BBox would not be set. Consider adding a comment explaining the logic behind this condition, or refactoring to make it more explicit when the custom BBox should be updated.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I copy/pasted this and don't know either.

Comment on lines 106 to 120
const handleUp = () => {
// On mouse up, we reset the dragging mode
if (draggedNode) {
graph.removeNodeAttribute(draggedNode, "highlighted")
}
isDragging = false
draggedNode = null
}
renderer.on("upNode", handleUp)
renderer.on("upStage", handleUp)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Consider adding a finally block to the handleUp function to ensure that isDragging and draggedNode are always reset, even if an error occurs within the if (draggedNode) block. This will prevent the dragging state from getting stuck in an inconsistent state.

Suggested change
const handleUp = () => {
// On mouse up, we reset the dragging mode
if (draggedNode) {
graph.removeNodeAttribute(draggedNode, "highlighted")
}
isDragging = false
draggedNode = null
}
renderer.on("upNode", handleUp)
renderer.on("upStage", handleUp)
const handleUp = () => {
try {
// On mouse up, we reset the dragging mode
if (draggedNode) {
graph.removeNodeAttribute(draggedNode, "highlighted")
}
} finally {
isDragging = false
draggedNode = null
}
}

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

@vorburger vorburger marked this pull request as ready for review March 25, 2025 21:57
I'll document it when I like; Thank You very much.
@vorburger vorburger merged commit cb47c87 into enola-dev:main Mar 25, 2025
9 checks passed
@vorburger vorburger deleted the sigma1 branch March 25, 2025 22:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant