Implement composite grouping for FCBH pericopes using section and pericope number

[Joel-Joseph-George]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • Chapter pericope results now keep verses separated when a section is present, preventing unrelated items from being merged.
  • Pericope responses now include section-aware numbering where applicable, improving consistency in chapter queries.
• Tests
  • Updated existing coverage for pericope responses.
  • Added a new case to verify grouping behavior when section values are returned.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: e8e3145d-6e3a-4d14-9471-c665beecb175

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 50c3ebe and e24f65a.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• src/domains/pericopes/pericopes.repository.ts
• src/domains/pericopes/pericopes.service.ts
• src/domains/pericopes/pericopes.test.ts

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pericope verses query now selects a section field. The chapter pericope grouping logic builds a composite key from section and pericopeNumber when section is present, otherwise falling back to pericopeNumber alone. Tests were updated and a new test added to cover section-based grouping.

Changes

Section-based pericope grouping

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Query and grouping logic src/domains/pericopes/pericopes.repository.ts, src/domains/pericopes/pericopes.service.ts	Repository selects section from pericope_verses; service groups rows using a composite section_pericopeNumber key when section is non-null, otherwise groups by pericopeNumber alone.
Grouping behavior tests src/domains/pericopes/pericopes.test.ts	Existing fixtures updated to include section: null; new test validates composite key grouping producing pericope numbers like 6_1 and 7_1.

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly describes the main change: composite grouping of FCBH pericopes by section and pericope number.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch ft/perciope-qa-fix

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}