Skip to content

Conversation

alcueca
Copy link
Contributor

@alcueca alcueca commented Aug 13, 2025

This PR includes a design document that proposes an updated NoncelessExecutionModule to be installed into all safes managed by OP Labs and the Optimism Foundation, and potentially the Security Council.

alcueca and others added 2 commits August 13, 2025 13:02
- Enhanced module execution explanation with hash-once mechanism details
- Added optional transaction ordering section with prerequisite support
@alcueca alcueca mentioned this pull request Aug 14, 2025

### Optional transaction ordering

The module supports optional transaction dependencies through a prerequisite mechanism. When creating a transaction, signers can specify that it should only execute after a specific previous transaction has completed.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Have you needed this in the past, for situations that a multi-send wouldn't solve?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Was OOO for a few weeks, coming back to this.

We have in the past had scenarios where several transactions need to be executed in a specific order (ie. add a new module, then upgrade chain A, then upgrade chain B, then remove an old module).

That's not to say we couldn't handle this mostly with ops, but the feature is a pretty small diff and gives the module more potential value as a public good by preserving the ability to enforce ordering as with the base GnosisSafe.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants