Add dating/cheating story hook and staged controversy skit patterns#148
Add dating/cheating story hook and staged controversy skit patterns#148exiao wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Two new UGC hook patterns from @themariaines case studies: 1. Dating/Cheating Story Hook: 97.2M views across 10 non-dating apps. Katch case study: 0K MRR in 90 days using cheating story UGC. 2. Staged Controversy Skit Hook: 62.8M+ views on job interview apps. Manufactured controversy format with moral-panic framing. Also adds The Trojan Horse Principle connecting these patterns with Investigation Arc and Familiar Brand as Villain. Bloom application shells included for both patterns.
|
Claude finished @exiao's task in 1m 32s —— View job Review of PR #148
Result: Changes RequestedThree issues found (see inline comments):
No issues with: frontmatter, hardcoded secrets, personal data, or broken file paths. File is at 489/500 lines — within limit but tight. Content quality and structure are solid. |
|
|
||
| The highest-performing UGC ad hooks share one structural insight: the app is never the subject of the hook. The hook is a universally engaging human scenario (relationship drama, job cheating, moral panic) that happens to require the app as a plot device. The viewer processes a story, not an ad. The product is discovered within the narrative, not pitched. | ||
|
|
||
| This principle connects: Dating/Cheating Story Hook, Staged Controversy Skit Hook, Investigation Arc, and Familiar Brand as Villain. All four use the same underlying mechanism with different emotional registers. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Section names don't match the actual headings. "Investigation Arc" → heading is "Investigation Arc UGC Hook" (line 230). "Familiar Brand as Villain" → heading is "Familiar Brand as Villain (Product Test Reveal)" (line 393, and it's ## not ###).
| This principle connects: Dating/Cheating Story Hook, Staged Controversy Skit Hook, Investigation Arc, and Familiar Brand as Villain. All four use the same underlying mechanism with different emotional registers. | |
| This principle connects: Dating/Cheating Story Hook, Staged Controversy Skit Hook, Investigation Arc UGC Hook, and Familiar Brand as Villain (Product Test Reveal). All four use the same underlying mechanism with different emotional registers. |
| | App | Views | Notes | | ||
| |-----|-------|-------| | ||
| | LockedIn AI | 62.8M | Reposted staged interviews with fresh hooks | | ||
| | Nora AI | 16M | Autonomous mock interview skits | | ||
| | Einstein AI | 7.9M | | | ||
| | Interview Pilot | 4.2M | | | ||
| | Interview Sidekick | 2.4M | Single video, 39.9K likes, 2,700x median engagement | | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Table lists 5 apps but the text below says "7 apps using the identical format." Either add the missing 2 apps to the table or correct the count to 5.
| - The skit format is infinitely repeatable: same structure, different interviewer questions, different creators | ||
| - Comment-section warfare keeps the video alive in the algorithm long after posting | ||
|
|
||
| **The meta-pattern** (shared with Dating/Cheating hooks): The app is never the hook. The hook is a universally engaging scenario (relationship drama, job interview cheating) that happens to require the app as a plot device. The product is discovered, not pitched. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This paragraph repeats almost verbatim what the "Trojan Horse Principle" section (line 107) already says. Replace with a cross-reference:
| **The meta-pattern** (shared with Dating/Cheating hooks): The app is never the hook. The hook is a universally engaging scenario (relationship drama, job interview cheating) that happens to require the app as a plot device. The product is discovered, not pitched. | |
| **The meta-pattern** (shared with Dating/Cheating hooks): See The Trojan Horse Principle above. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Three issues to fix:
-
Trojan Horse Principle references wrong section names — "Investigation Arc" should be "Investigation Arc UGC Hook" and "Familiar Brand as Villain" should be "Familiar Brand as Villain (Product Test Reveal)" to match the actual headings.
-
Staged Controversy table claims 7 apps but lists 5 — Either add the 2 missing apps or fix the count.
-
Redundant meta-pattern paragraph — The "meta-pattern" block in Staged Controversy (line 343) repeats the Trojan Horse Principle almost verbatim. Replace with a cross-reference.
No hardcoded secrets, no broken file paths, no personal data. Frontmatter unchanged and valid. File is at 489/500 lines — within limit but tight. Structure and content quality are solid.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces several new UGC ad hook strategies to the SKILL.md documentation, including the Trojan Horse Principle, Dating/Cheating Story hooks, and Staged Controversy Skit hooks. These additions provide detailed structural frameworks, evidence-based case studies, and specific application examples for the Bloom product. Feedback from the review focuses on improving document usability by adding internal Markdown anchors for navigation and formatting external source URLs as proper links.
|
|
||
| The highest-performing UGC ad hooks share one structural insight: the app is never the subject of the hook. The hook is a universally engaging human scenario (relationship drama, job cheating, moral panic) that happens to require the app as a plot device. The viewer processes a story, not an ad. The product is discovered within the narrative, not pitched. | ||
|
|
||
| This principle connects: Dating/Cheating Story Hook, Staged Controversy Skit Hook, Investigation Arc, and Familiar Brand as Villain. All four use the same underlying mechanism with different emotional registers. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
To improve document navigation, consider linking these referenced patterns to their respective sections using internal Markdown anchors.
| This principle connects: Dating/Cheating Story Hook, Staged Controversy Skit Hook, Investigation Arc, and Familiar Brand as Villain. All four use the same underlying mechanism with different emotional registers. | |
| This principle connects: [Dating/Cheating Story Hook](#datingcheating-story-hook), [Staged Controversy Skit Hook](#staged-controversy-skit-hook), [Investigation Arc](#investigation-arc-ugc-hook), and [Familiar Brand as Villain](#familiar-brand-as-villain-product-test-reveal). All four use the same underlying mechanism with different emotional registers. |
|
|
||
| ### Staged Controversy Skit Hook | ||
|
|
||
| Source: @themariaines, May 2026. SGE breakdown: socialgrowthengineers.com/the-only-playbook-of-job-interview-apps |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The source URL should be formatted as a Markdown link for better usability and consistency with other references in the document. Additionally, ensure the protocol (https://) is included for proper resolution.
| Source: @themariaines, May 2026. SGE breakdown: socialgrowthengineers.com/the-only-playbook-of-job-interview-apps | |
| Source: @themariaines, May 2026. [SGE breakdown](https://socialgrowthengineers.com/the-only-playbook-of-job-interview-apps) |
What
Adds two new UGC hook patterns to the hooks skill, plus a unifying principle that connects them with existing patterns.
New sections
Dating/Cheating Story Hook - Use relationship drama as the storyline hook for any app category. The app appears as a plot device, never as the subject of the hook.
main story + important detail in ( )Staged Controversy Skit Hook - Stage a skit where someone "cheats" using an app. Manufactured controversy triggers comment-section engagement.
The Trojan Horse Principle - Brief connecting note added to the UGC Ad Hooks intro section. Names the shared structural insight: the app is never the hook, the hook is a universally engaging human scenario.
Source
File changed
writing/hooks/SKILL.md(114 lines added, 489 total, under 500 line limit)