-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48.5k
[compiler] Fixture tests for PropertyStore effects #33163
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
josephsavona
wants to merge
6
commits into
gh/josephsavona/83/base
Choose a base branch
from
gh/josephsavona/83/head
base: gh/josephsavona/83/base
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Adds fixture tests to demonstrate an issue in changing PropertyStore to always have a Store effect on its object operand, regardless of the operand type. The issue is that if we're doing a PropertyStore on a nested value, that has be considered a transitive mutation of the parent object: ``` const x = {y: {z: {}}}; x.y.z.key = 'value'; // this has to be a mutation of `x` ``` Fix in the next PR. [ghstack-poisoned]
This was referenced May 9, 2025
Adds fixture tests to demonstrate an issue in changing PropertyStore to always have a Store effect on its object operand, regardless of the operand type. The issue is that if we're doing a PropertyStore on a nested value, that has be considered a transitive mutation of the parent object: ``` const x = {y: {z: {}}}; x.y.z.key = 'value'; // this has to be a mutation of `x` ``` Fix in the next PR. [ghstack-poisoned]
Adds fixture tests to demonstrate an issue in changing PropertyStore to always have a Store effect on its object operand, regardless of the operand type. The issue is that if we're doing a PropertyStore on a nested value, that has be considered a transitive mutation of the parent object: ``` const x = {y: {z: {}}}; x.y.z.key = 'value'; // this has to be a mutation of `x` ``` Fix in the next PR. [ghstack-poisoned]
Adds fixture tests to demonstrate an issue in changing PropertyStore to always have a Store effect on its object operand, regardless of the operand type. The issue is that if we're doing a PropertyStore on a nested value, that has be considered a transitive mutation of the parent object: ``` const x = {y: {z: {}}}; x.y.z.key = 'value'; // this has to be a mutation of `x` ``` Fix in the next PR. [ghstack-poisoned]
Adds fixture tests to demonstrate an issue in changing PropertyStore to always have a Store effect on its object operand, regardless of the operand type. The issue is that if we're doing a PropertyStore on a nested value, that has be considered a transitive mutation of the parent object: ``` const x = {y: {z: {}}}; x.y.z.key = 'value'; // this has to be a mutation of `x` ``` Fix in the next PR. [ghstack-poisoned]
Adds fixture tests to demonstrate an issue in changing PropertyStore to always have a Store effect on its object operand, regardless of the operand type. The issue is that if we're doing a PropertyStore on a nested value, that has be considered a transitive mutation of the parent object: ``` const x = {y: {z: {}}}; x.y.z.key = 'value'; // this has to be a mutation of `x` ``` Fix in the next PR. [ghstack-poisoned]
This was referenced May 13, 2025
rkpatel009
pushed a commit
to rkpatel009/react
that referenced
this pull request
May 13, 2025
Adds fixture tests to demonstrate an issue in changing PropertyStore to always have a Store effect on its object operand, regardless of the operand type. The issue is that if we're doing a PropertyStore on a nested value, that has be considered a transitive mutation of the parent object: ``` const x = {y: {z: {}}}; x.y.z.key = 'value'; // this has to be a mutation of `x` ``` Fix in the next PR. ghstack-source-id: 4d3ea71 Pull Request resolved: facebook/react#33163
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
Adds fixture tests to demonstrate an issue in changing PropertyStore to always have a Store effect on its object operand, regardless of the operand type. The issue is that if we're doing a PropertyStore on a nested value, that has be considered a transitive mutation of the parent object:
Fix in the next PR.