Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Prefix Bloom Filter #103

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

khlopkov
Copy link

This PR supposed to resolve #97

Please, let me know if I missed something.

@khlopkov khlopkov force-pushed the feat/prefix_bloom_filter branch from dc3bbca to 4d4941d Compare January 18, 2025 14:16
/// Checks if a key is in domain and prefix can be extracted from it.
/// For example if `PrefixExtractor` suppose to extract first 4 bytes from key,
/// `in_domain(&[0, 2, 3])` should return false
fn in_domain(&self, key: &[u8]) -> bool;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think this is necessary.
If a key is [1, 2, 3] and we extract the first 4 bytes, we would just take the entire string, so:

let len = Math.min(key.len(), 4);
return key.slice(0, len);

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let me better explain why is this needed in more practical example:

Imagine we have a database where keys are constructed using the following template: {datatype}#{id} and a prefix extractor that would extract {datatype}# prefix from a key to optimize scans of all rows of datatype#. Then, in table were populated following rows table1#a, table1#b, table2#a. The keys for bloom filter would be table1#, table2# in this case. Then, if we use prefix scan by prefixes table1# or table2# everything will work correctly. But if scan is performed with table prefix without in_domain the full prefix will be extracted and will try to check bloom filter by table key, which may return false negative. in_domain in this case will help to prevent such cases and will use Bloom Filter only in case when prefix is in domain. In this example everything starting with {datatype}# will be considered as in_domain and use Bloom Filter, other prefixes will be not in_domain and will just use normal prefix search ignoring Bloom Filter

Copy link
Contributor

@marvin-j97 marvin-j97 Jan 20, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense.

However, for the prefix extractor to support structured prefixes, the trait needs to return an Iterator over extracted prefixed (see #97 and fjall-rs/fjall#116). At that point, the trait could just return std::iter::empty, which would signal that the key is "not in domain".

For example we may extract prefixes, like:

eu#germany#berlin

-> extract "eu#" as prefix
-> also extract "eu#germany#"

Now prefix searches over both continent and [continent + country] can be filtered by the prefix filter.

@@ -248,8 +251,20 @@ impl Writer {
// of the same key
#[cfg(feature = "bloom")]
if self.bloom_policy.is_active() {
self.bloom_hash_buffer
.push(BloomFilter::get_hash(&item.key.user_key));
let key: Option<&[u8]> = match &self.opts.prefix_extractor {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To control the bits per key independently for prefix and point reads, the prefix bloom filter needs to be built from its own buffer, and stored separately in the disk segment.
That's why there's a dedicated pointer for prefix filters in the segment metadata which is currently unused and always 0 (NULL):

pub pfx_ptr: BlockOffset,

@@ -602,7 +605,17 @@ impl Tree {
// NOTE: Create key hash for hash sharing
// https://fjall-rs.github.io/post/bloom-filter-hash-sharing/
#[cfg(feature = "bloom")]
let key_hash = crate::bloom::BloomFilter::get_hash(key.as_ref());
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When the prefix bloom filter is separated, this can all be reverted because the point read path does not change at all.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Prefix bloom filters
2 participants