Skip to content

Update top-level readme with project status and refactoring note #1097

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 7, 2025

Conversation

kylebarron
Copy link
Member

@kylebarron kylebarron commented May 7, 2025

ref #1095

cc @BlakeOrth

@kylebarron kylebarron merged commit f494942 into main May 7, 2025
18 checks passed
@kylebarron kylebarron deleted the kyle/update-readme-project-status branch May 7, 2025 18:57
@a10y
Copy link

a10y commented May 7, 2025

Thank you for authoring and maintaining this project! I've been investigating interop with GeoArrow in Vortex and happened to notice this README update.

I've been pinning my dependencies to git shas as I've been prototyping to get all of the unreleased changes in the past few months, but sadly crates.io doesn't let you publish a crate that has unpublished deps. I was wondering if the separate crates you mentioned, geoarrow-array, geoarrow-schema etc. would be published to crates.io at some point?

@BlakeOrth
Copy link
Contributor

@a10y I suspect you'll be able to follow along to the next release with this issue here: #1098

@kylebarron
Copy link
Member Author

Indeed yes, I would like to get a release out, as soon as we get released versions of wkt and wkb dependencies. Let's discuss more in #1098

kylebarron added a commit that referenced this pull request May 14, 2025
As described in #1097, the
old `geoarrow` crate is being refactored into a monorepo of smaller
crates. Most of the core refactoring has been done (except for IO,
primarily) and so this PR deletes a large amount of this old code that
has no more purpose in this repo.

👋
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants