Skip to content

Conversation

@shollyman
Copy link
Contributor

This PR effectively moves ownership for this repo to the python language team, and removes api-bigquery as the defacto code owner.

This PR effectively moves ownership for this repo to the python
language team, and removes api-bigquery as the defacto code owner.
@shollyman shollyman requested review from a team as code owners December 15, 2025 18:34
@shollyman shollyman requested a review from logachev December 15, 2025 18:34
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added the size: xs Pull request size is extra small. label Dec 15, 2025
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added the api: bigquery Issues related to the googleapis/python-bigquery-sqlalchemy API. label Dec 15, 2025
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @shollyman, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request streamlines the repository's maintenance and routing by reassigning its core ownership. The changes ensure that all future issues, pull requests, and general code ownership responsibilities are directed to the appropriate Python language team, centralizing management and improving operational efficiency.

Highlights

  • Ownership Transfer: The repository's ownership has been formally transferred from the api-bigquery team to the python-core-client-libraries team.
  • Automated Assignment Updates: The .github/blunderbuss.yml configuration has been updated to reflect the new ownership, ensuring that new issues and pull requests are automatically assigned to the python-core-client-libraries team.
  • Metadata Update: The codeowner_team field in .repo-metadata.json has been updated to @googleapis/python-core-client-libraries, aligning the repository's metadata with the new ownership structure.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request aims to transfer repository ownership to the Python language team. The update to .repo-metadata.json correctly reflects this change. My main feedback concerns the changes in .github/blunderbuss.yml. As this file is autogenerated, it's generally best practice to let automation handle its updates based on the source .repo-metadata.json file. I've left a specific comment suggesting to revert the changes in that file to align with the process indicated in its header.

@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added size: s Pull request size is small. and removed size: xs Pull request size is extra small. labels Dec 15, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@chalmerlowe chalmerlowe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@shollyman shollyman removed the request for review from logachev December 15, 2025 18:44
@shollyman shollyman assigned chalmerlowe and unassigned yirutang Dec 15, 2025
@Linchin Linchin self-requested a review December 15, 2025 18:54
@shollyman shollyman added the automerge Merge the pull request once unit tests and other checks pass. label Dec 15, 2025
@shollyman shollyman merged commit 7f3f342 into googleapis:main Dec 15, 2025
12 checks passed
@shollyman shollyman deleted the issuerouting branch December 15, 2025 20:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

api: bigquery Issues related to the googleapis/python-bigquery-sqlalchemy API. automerge Merge the pull request once unit tests and other checks pass. size: s Pull request size is small.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants