Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Select return content type based on Accept header #919
Select return content type based on Accept header #919
Changes from 9 commits
cd5cad5
080552f
563656a
b419913
4f52583
04a3317
1b87b95
4c82572
95719c6
e01c2fa
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why alias?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are two different
MediaTypeHeaderValue
classes both within scope (if I recall correctly).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Techically, it is not deprecated. It just does not exist anymore since they removed it from draft spec.
Check notice
Code scanning / CodeQL
Missed opportunity to use Select
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, what if client specified "application/pdf" or "application/some_unknown_mime" in accept header?
From https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7231#section-5.3.2
Do you want to go with second option?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That’s the case now (merged in this PR). Please read my response to your comments on this earlier today. TLDR: maybe update in v8 to reject with 406
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
😕 called each time
Check notice
Code scanning / CodeQL
Missed ternary opportunity
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I read it several times and this comment still seems strange to me. I don't understand the meaning of matches.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I mean in generally I understand what you want to say but from the point of view of some "external" developer it may look strange.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I do the best I can. Sometimes I'm tongue tied. Here it seemed to make sense to me, but I get it. Feel free to suggest an improvement.