Skip to content

groupoid/axio

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

Mar 25, 2025
821371c · Mar 25, 2025
Mar 8, 2025
Mar 8, 2025
Feb 28, 2025
Mar 8, 2025
Apr 8, 2022
Mar 26, 2024
Mar 25, 2025
Jun 25, 2022
Mar 18, 2025
Apr 8, 2022
Apr 8, 2022
Apr 8, 2022
Mar 22, 2024
Mar 18, 2025
Mar 22, 2024
Apr 8, 2022
Mar 22, 2024

Repository files navigation

AXIO/1

Artificial Experienced Intelligent Ontology v10.0 (2025)

  • Українською: Штучна Досвідчена Інтелектуальна Онтологія
  • Тибетською: བཟོ་བཀོད་ཀྱི་ཉམས་ཡོད་པའི་རིག་པའི་ངོ་བོ་ལུགས། (bzo bkod kyi nyams yod pa'i rig pa'i ngo bo lugs)

Table of Contents (དཀར་ཆག dkar chag)

  • Introduction
  • Process
  • Components
  • Operators
  • Refinments
  • Goals
  • Runtime Languages
  • Higher Languages

1. Introduction (ངོ་སྤྲོད ngo sprod)

The AXIO/1 Framework is a layered system for infinite reasoning, structured into:

  • Runtime Languages: Execute computations and manage concurrency.
  • Higher Languages: Handle theorem proving and formal verification.

This framework operates as a cyclic, iterative system for formal reasoning, where an operator (human, AI, or hybrid) directs a process that continuously refines itself.

2. Process (ལས་ཀ las ka)

AXIO/1 follows a structured flow:

  1. Conditions: Foundational elements (Axioms, Definitions, Types, Propositions, Syntax).
  2. Environment: The structured setting (Model, Consistency, Completeness, Library).
  3. Thinking: Reasoning mechanisms (Hypotheses, Computation, Deduction, Conjecture, Inference Rules, General Induction).
  4. Fruit: Logical results (Proof, Judgment, Theorem).
  5. Insight: Higher-level understanding (Semantics, Categorical Frameworks, Abstraction).

3. Components (ཆ་ཤས cha shas)

Condition (C) རྐྱེན Умова rkyen

    C = (A, D, T, P, X)
  • Axioms (A): Fundamental truths.
  • Definitions (D): Precise descriptions of entities.
  • Types (T): Categorization of objects.
  • Syntax (X): Structural rules.

Environment (E) ཁོར་ཡུག Середовище khor yug

    E = (M, C, K, L)
  • Model (M): Formal representation of the system.
  • Consistency (C): No contradictions within the system.
  • Completeness (K): The extent to which all truths can be derived.
  • Library (L): Repository of known results.

Reason (T) རྒྱུ Причина rgyu

    T = (J, H, C, D, G)
  • Judgment (J): Logical assertions.
  • Hypotheses (H): Presupposition, Assumption, Supposition, Proposition.
  • Computation (C): Lambda Calculus, Pi-Calculus.
  • Deduction (D): Inference Rules, General Induction.
  • Conjecture/Assertion (G): Formulation of potential truths.

Fruit (F) འབྲས་བུ Плід 'bras bu

    F = (⊢,Θ)
  • Proof ⊢ Verified propositions.
  • Theorem Θ Established truths.

Insight (I) ལྟ་བའི་ཤེས་པ lta ba'i shes pa

    I = (S, C, A)
  • Semantics Σ: Meaning assignment.
  • Categorical Frameworks C: High-level abstractions..
  • Abstraction A: Generalization of concepts.

3. Operators (བཀོལ་སྤྱོད་པ bkol spyod pa)

Three types of operators drive the system:

  • Human: Chooses propositions, interprets insights, and guides conjectures.
  • Machine: Automates computations, checks consistency, and suggests hypotheses.
  • Hybrid: Human sets goals, machine executes reasoning steps.

4. Refinements (ལེགས་བཅོས legs bcos)

Ensuring correctness and progression:

  • Infinite Thinking: Achieved via iteration Sₙ → ∞.
  • Finite Steps: Each step is discrete, Sₙ → Sₙ₊₁.
  • Operator-Driven: The direction of reasoning is controlled by O.

The cycle repeats indefinitely, refining knowledge.

    S₀ → S₁ → S₂ → ... → Sₙ → Sₙ₊₁ → ...

Where:

  • Sₙ is a finite reasoning step.
  • Sₙ₊₁ builds upon Sₙ, ensuring refinement.
  • Limit process: lim (n → ∞) Sₙ represents infinite reasoning.

5. Design Goals (དམིགས་ཡུལ dmigs yul)

  • Runtime Languages: Handle computation and concurrency.
  • Higher Languages: Ensure theorem proving and soundness.
  • Infinite Thinking: Achieved via refinements cycles.
  • Operator-Driven: Collaboration between humans and machines.

Runtime Languages (ལག་ལེན་གྱི་སྐད lag len gyi skad)

Joe

Role: Certified bytecode stack interpreter and compiler to Intel/ARM. Features: Executes Lambda Calculus terms as bytecode, compiles to native code. Fit: Computes concrete results. Certified for reliability. Use Case: Operator runs algebraic steps or tests hypotheses on hardware.

Bob

Role: Parallel, concurrent, non-blocking, zero-copy runtime with CAS cursors (compare-and-swap). Features: Implements Pi-Calculus-style concurrency, optimized for matrix operations (BLAS-like). Fit: Manages distributed validation across nodes, computes in parallel (e.g., parity table cases). Use Case: Operator coordinates multi-threaded proof checks or simulations.

Alice

Role: Linear types calculus with partial fractions for BLAS level 3 programming. Features: Ensures resource safety (linear types), optimizes matrix computations (e.g., tensor products). Fit: Handles complex (e.g., matrix-based proofs), enforces no redundant copies. Use Case: Operator proves theorems involving linear algebra or tensor structures.

Higher Languages (མཐོ་རིམ་གྱི་སྐད mtho rim gyi skad)

Henk

Role: Pure Type System (PTS-91), Calculus of Constructions (CoC-88), infinite universes, AUTOMATH-68 syntax. Features: Flexible typing. Use Case: Operator formalizes recursive or foundational proofs. Rationale: Henk subsumes Alonzo’s STLC with richer types, making it a strong starting point.

Per

Role: ΠΣ (MLTT-72) prover with CoC, identity types (MLTT-75), well-founded trees (MLTT-80). Features: Dependent types, equality proofs. Fit: Proves (e.g., "parity preservation"), ensures consistency. Use Case: Operator handles equality or model-specific theorems.

Frank

Role: Pure Lambda (CoC-88, PTS-91) + Inductive Constructions (CIC-89). Features: Dependent types, equality proofs. Fit: Proves (e.g., "parity preservation"), ensures consistency. Use Case: Operator handles equality or model-specific theorems.

Christine

Role: ΠΣ (MLTT-72) prover with CoC, identity types (MLTT-75), extended to CIC (IND-89). Features: Dependent types, equality proofs. Fit: Proves (e.g., "parity preservation"), ensures consistency. Use Case: Operator handles equality or model-specific theorems.

Anders

Role: Homotopy Type System (HTS-2013) with Strict Equality and Cubical Agda (CCHM-2016). Features: Higher-dimensional types, paths, cubical primitives. Fit: Extracts (e.g., "parity as a homotopy group"), builds cat. Use Case: Operator abstracts to categorical or topological structures.

Dan

Role: Simplicial CCHM-based system, replacing Rzk/GAP. Features: Simplicial types, primitives (Simplex, Chain, Monoid, Category, Group). Fit: Formalizes cat (e.g., "parity as a monoid"), verifies geometric proofs. Use Case: Operator proves simplicial or algebraic topology insights.

Jack

Role: A Framework for Chromatic Homotopy Theory and K-Theory. Features: Hopf Fibrations, Suspensions, Truncations, Π, Σ, Id, ℕ, ℕ∞. Use Case: Operator links proofs to topological or physical systems.

Urs

Role: A Framework for Supergeometry in Cohesive Topos. Features: Hopf Fibrations, Suspensions, Truncations, Π, Σ, Id, ℕ, ℕ∞. Use Case: Operator links proofs to topological or physical systems.

Fabien

Role: Motivic A^1-Homotopy Theory. Featues: Π,Σ,Path,𝑘:𝑈,0_𝑘,1_𝑘,point_𝑘,𝐴^1:U,point:𝑘→𝐴^1., a1contr, 𝐿_{A^1}:U→𝑈, 𝜂_{A^1}, rec_{A^1}, n-Trunc, 𝑁, Suspension,S^{1,1}. Use case: derives all structural theorems of A^1-Homotopy Theory—such as A^1-connectivity (X×A^1)≅π_n(A^1), contractibility of 𝐴^1, and unstable connectivity — while providing a foundation for stable A^1-homotopy via suspensions and motivic spheres.

Laurent

Role: Mathematical and Functional Analysis, Calculus. Features: ℝ, C, Nat, Boo, Forall, Exists, Set, Measure, Lebesgue. Seq, Inf, Sup, Lim. Use case: Real Analysis, Functional Analysis.

Ernst

Role: ZFC LEM theories. Features: 𝑉, Pow(𝐴), 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵; LEM: ⊢ 𝑃 ∨ ¬𝑃 Use case: Classical Logic Support.

Paul

Role: Forced Cardinals. Features: ⊢ 𝜅 : Card, inaccessible(𝜅), measurable(𝜅), Force(𝑃, 𝐺) : 𝑉 → 𝑉, 𝑝 ⊩ 𝜙 Use case: Generic filter 𝐺 over a poset 𝑃, yielding a new model 𝑉[𝐺], adjoin reals and control cardinalities or axioms.

AXIOSIS

Axiomatic Extended Integrated Ordered System for Infinite Structures is a novel type theory engineered to mechanically verify all existing theorems across mathematics, from classical analysis to modern set theory and homotopy. Building on top of advanced frameworks:

  • Henk Barendregt Type Theory for Pure Dependent Lambda Calculus,
  • Per Martin-Löf Type Theory for Fibrational setting and inductive types,
  • Anders Mörtberg Type Theory for CCHM/CHM/HTS bootstrap,
  • Dan Kan Simplicial HoTT,
  • Jack Morava Type Theory for Chromatic Homotopy Theory and K-Theory,
  • Urs Schreiber Type Theory for Equivariant Supergeometry,
  • Fabien Morel Type Theory for A¹-homotopy theory,
  • Laurent Schwartz Type Theory for Functional Analysis and Calculus,
  • Ernst Zermelo Type Theory for ZFC with LEM, and
  • Paul Cohen Type Theory for cardinals system incorporating large cardinals and forcing

this system synthesis unifies synthetic homotopy, stable homotopy spectra, cohesive geometry, real analysis, and set-theoretic foundations into a single, computationally verifiable formalism. We demonstrate its power through key theorems:

  • Number Theory: Prime Number Theorem
  • Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (Analysis):
  • Analysis: Lebesgue Dominated Convergence Theorem
  • Topology: Poincaré Conjecture (3D)
  • Algebra: Classification of Finite Simple Groups
  • Set Theory: Independence of the Continuum Hypothesis (CH)
  • Category Theory: Adjoint Functor Theorem
  • Homotopy Theory: Adams Conjecture (via K-theory)
  • Consistency of ZFC with Large Cardinals
  • Fermat’s Last Theorem
  • Large Cardinal Theorem: Martin’s Maximum

showcasing its ability to span algebraic, analytic, topological, and foundational domains. AXIOSIS stands as a candidate for a universal mechanized mathematics platform, rivaling systems like Cubical Type Theory while extending their scope.

AXIOSIS achieves a landmark synthesis, unifying synthetic and classical mathematics in a mechanically verifiable framework. Its type formers—spanning simplicial ∞-categories, stable spectra, cohesive modalities, reals, ZFC, large cardinals, and forcing — cover all known mathematical domains as of 2025.

Monography

LaTeX

$ cp *.ttf ~/.local/share/fonts
$ sudo apt install texlive-full
$ sudo fc-cache -f
$ fc-match Geometria
$ make

Sole Copyright

Namdak Tonpa

About

🧊 Методологія верифікації теорем

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks