Add surrounding features - Agents Documentations with Other features - #168
Conversation
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 8cdc857c37
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| POLICY_SET_NEWEST_VERSION = "newest_version" | ||
| POLICY_SET_CURRENT_VERSION = "current_version" | ||
| POLICY_SET_WORKSPACE_EXCLUSIONS = "workspace_exclusions" | ||
| POLICY_SET_PROJECT_EXCLUSIONS = "project_exclusions" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The new POLICY_SET_PROJECT_EXCLUSIONS enum value is set to "project_exclusions", but policy-set include tokens follow the API relationship naming (hyphenated, e.g. workspace-exclusions). When callers pass this enum via PolicySetReadOptions.include, the client will send an unsupported include token and the read request can fail with a 4xx instead of returning the policy set with exclusions.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
iam404
changed the title
1 participant
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.