docs: add certification report (170+ repos) + HTML leaderboard#62
docs: add certification report (170+ repos) + HTML leaderboard#62hummbl-dev merged 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
…derboard Cross-category certification data from scanning 170+ repos: - AI governance, LLM frameworks, ML platforms, healthcare, fintech, developer tools, cloud infra, web frameworks, observability, gaming, education, security, crypto, robotics, cybersec, API platforms - Key finding: governance is the #1 differentiator, not code quality - LangChain: 95.4 code, 45 governance → PROVISIONAL - MONAI: 98.2 overall, 100 governance → highest score tested - Self-contained HTML leaderboard for deployment Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <[email protected]>
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: dd1f47eb76
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
|
||
| ### 5. The certification threshold works | ||
|
|
||
| The 80-point CERTIFIED threshold correctly identifies repos that enterprises would trust. The 60-point PROVISIONAL threshold correctly flags repos that need governance improvement before enterprise adoption. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The report says an overall score of 80+ maps to CERTIFIED (docs/CERTIFICATION_REPORT.md, line 128), but the same file marks Prefect as FAILED at 80.6 (line 47). Without explicitly documenting the extra failure gate in the methodology/threshold section, readers cannot reproduce certification outcomes and may apply the published thresholds incorrectly.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
1 participant
Summary
Business value
This data powers HUMMBL's pitch: "LangChain scores 95.4 on code quality but only 45 on governance — PROVISIONAL. HUMMBL exists to fix that gap."
🤖 Generated with Claude Code