-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 239
Redeploy cctpv2 with core 10.0.4 #1254
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: 2c945c7 The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
Check Warp Deploy Summary
Last updated: 2025-11-28 22:14:12 UTC |
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughUpdated USDC mainnet CCTP v2 fast deployment config: all Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
Tip 📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.
Example instruction:
Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
paulbalaji
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
went through explorers and marked as proxy where i could to complete verification, left comments on the ones that weren't verified - unsure how strict we are on it
also satisifed that you can ignore the check-warp-deploy ci failure because it works fine locally without public rpcs
yarn tsx scripts/check/check-deploy.ts -e mainnet3 -m warp --warpRouteId USDC/mainnet-cctp-v2-fast
warp checker found no violations
| @@ -1,280 +1,280 @@ | |||
| tokens: | |||
| - addressOrDenom: "0xC9d7f943d2056a5927FFCE4b689dA17A9719374C" | |||
| - addressOrDenom: "0xb0B8D4C6EF212D76d5079df5Ff7A0888A27e9b32" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| - token: ethereum|sonic|0xc508E179297ef72e65909e4D072758C2d0B92B83 | ||
| - token: ethereum|unichain|0xc508E179297ef72e65909e4D072758C2d0B92B83 | ||
| - token: ethereum|worldchain|0xc508E179297ef72e65909e4D072758C2d0B92B83 | ||
| - token: ethereum|avalanche|0x8dadbDE67eD0589d90cdE3C940045F10092AcC11 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| - token: ethereum|optimism|0xb0B8D4C6EF212D76d5079df5Ff7A0888A27e9b32 | ||
| - token: ethereum|plume|0x0706DE5b87F03C0c6fDC8a03D987D06f776eF6bf | ||
| - token: ethereum|polygon|0x8dadbDE67eD0589d90cdE3C940045F10092AcC11 | ||
| - token: ethereum|sei|0xAE3d8F7C4d7527BfaF2f15c43D1B6ea39802838B |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
proxy + impl not verified
| - token: ethereum|plume|0x0706DE5b87F03C0c6fDC8a03D987D06f776eF6bf | ||
| - token: ethereum|polygon|0x8dadbDE67eD0589d90cdE3C940045F10092AcC11 | ||
| - token: ethereum|sei|0xAE3d8F7C4d7527BfaF2f15c43D1B6ea39802838B | ||
| - token: ethereum|sonic|0x8dadbDE67eD0589d90cdE3C940045F10092AcC11 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
not verified
| - token: ethereum|polygon|0x8dadbDE67eD0589d90cdE3C940045F10092AcC11 | ||
| - token: ethereum|sei|0xAE3d8F7C4d7527BfaF2f15c43D1B6ea39802838B | ||
| - token: ethereum|sonic|0x8dadbDE67eD0589d90cdE3C940045F10092AcC11 | ||
| - token: ethereum|unichain|0x5b7A1a03F26C05D68ada7CE67d49db263e2D0d9B |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
not verified
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The check job failure is due to an rpc error but running warp check locally gives no config errors and contract seem not to be verified
Description
Backward compatibility
Testing
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.