Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extend RestrictedSecurity constraints #935

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: openj9
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

KostasTsiounis
Copy link
Contributor

The functionality of the provider constraints in RestrictedSecurity profiles is extended. Instead of allowing them to be universally used, one can optionally indicate the specific module and/or class from where a particular cryptographic algorithm can be called.

Tests are, also, added to test the new functionality offered through RestrictedSecurity profiles.

Signed-off-by: Kostas Tsiounis [email protected]

@KostasTsiounis KostasTsiounis force-pushed the constraint_stack_strict branch from 0e832f3 to 67cd84a Compare February 13, 2025 19:38
@pshipton pshipton requested a review from keithc-ca February 14, 2025 03:36
@KostasTsiounis KostasTsiounis force-pushed the constraint_stack_strict branch 2 times, most recently from 3b056c8 to f71ed5a Compare February 20, 2025 17:19
The functionality of the provider constraints in
RestrictedSecurity profiles is extended. Instead of
allowing them to be universally used, one can optionally
indicate the specific module and/or class from where
a particular cryptographic algorithm can be called.

Tests are, also, added to test the new functionality
offered through RestrictedSecurity profiles.

Signed-off-by: Kostas Tsiounis <[email protected]>
@KostasTsiounis KostasTsiounis force-pushed the constraint_stack_strict branch from f71ed5a to f42c9c3 Compare February 20, 2025 17:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant