Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Allow more GitHub-pages style domains #344

Merged

Conversation

chrysn
Copy link
Contributor

@chrysn chrysn commented Jul 18, 2023

The added domains serve the GitHub pages equivalents of GitLab and Codeberg. As adjustments1 to the i-d-template come in that facilitate more diverse hosting, users will want to diff draft versions from there.

The added domains serve the GitHub pages equivalents of GitLab and Codeberg. As adjustments[1] to the i-d-template come in that facilitate more diverse hosting, users will want to diff draft versions from there.

[1]: martinthomson/i-d-template#398
@chrysn
Copy link
Contributor Author

chrysn commented Jul 18, 2023

I'm unfamiliar with the definition of "semantic" or "conventional" that is used by the CI checker (for neither are terms defined for git); please suggest an acceptable commit title or point me to the relevant documentation.

@kesara kesara changed the title Allow more GitHub-pages style domains chore: Allow more GitHub-pages style domains Jul 19, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 19, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #344 (7f9eb7c) into main (8497ea9) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #344   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.09%   97.09%           
=======================================
  Files          11       11           
  Lines         965      965           
=======================================
  Hits          937      937           
  Misses         28       28           

@kesara
Copy link
Member

kesara commented Jul 19, 2023

I'm unfamiliar with the definition of "semantic" or "conventional" that is used by the CI checker (for neither are terms defined for git); please suggest an acceptable commit title or point me to the relevant documentation.

@chrysn You can find more about conventional commits here: https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/

But it's all good since we squash and merge, we can change the final commit massage.

@kesara kesara merged commit 52b2340 into ietf-tools:main Jul 19, 2023
kesara added a commit to ietf-tools/ietf-at-ui that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2023
kesara added a commit to ietf-tools/ietf-at-ui that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2023
chrysn added a commit to chrysn-pull-requests/ietf-at that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2023
The entry added in ietf-tools#344 was incorrectly using the plural TLD, when the actual TLD is singular ".page".
kesara pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2023
The entry added in #344 was incorrectly using the plural TLD, when the actual TLD is singular ".page".
@chrysn chrysn deleted the add-gitlabio-codebergpages branch July 19, 2023 08:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants