Skip to content

Conversation

@Piyush7034
Copy link
Contributor

@Piyush7034 Piyush7034 commented Jan 23, 2026

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Optimized internal library loading mechanism for improved initialization process.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 23, 2026

Walkthrough

The IdaDataProviderPluginImpl static initializer was updated to remove the explicit Loader.load(opencv_java.class) call. OpenCV initialization now relies exclusively on nu.pattern.OpenCV.loadLocally(), with Jasper support configuration applied afterward.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
OpenCV Initialization Refactor
mosip-identity-certify-plugin/src/main/java/io/mosip/certify/mosipid/integration/service/IdaDataProviderPluginImpl.java
Removed Loader.load(opencv_java.class) from static initializer; OpenCV loading now delegated to nu.pattern.OpenCV.loadLocally()

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 The old loader's gone, no more,
Nu-pattern handles OpenCV chore,
With Jasper's smile and lighter code,
Dependencies hop down the road! 📦✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: removing the Loader.load(opencv_java.class) bytedeco library call from the static initializer.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@swatigoel swatigoel merged commit 8f8ccc6 into inji:develop Jan 23, 2026
17 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants