[INJIVER-1523] Fixed LSH comments - updated ReadMe, added design doc, fixed Code Rabbit comments from PR 230 for CWT#231
Conversation
Signed-off-by: jaswanthkumarpolisetty <jaswanthkumar.p@thoughtworks.com>
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughAdds CWT-VC (CBOR Web Token) support: new Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant VerifierFactory
participant CwtVC as CwtVerifiableCredential
participant Validator as CwtValidator
participant Verifier as CwtVerifier
participant JWKS as Issuer JWKS (HTTP)
participant Crypto as Crypto Lib
Client->>VerifierFactory: submit credential (cwt-vc)
VerifierFactory->>CwtVC: instantiate handler
CwtVC->>Validator: validate structure & claims
Validator-->>CwtVC: validation result
alt validation OK
CwtVC->>Verifier: request signature verification
Verifier->>JWKS: resolve issuer public key (.well-known/jwks.json)
JWKS-->>Verifier: public key (COSE/JWK)
Verifier->>Crypto: verify COSE_Sign1 signature with key
Crypto-->>Verifier: verification result
Verifier-->>CwtVC: verification result
CwtVC-->>Client: final verdict (valid/invalid)
else validation failed
CwtVC-->>Client: validation error
end
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@doc/cwt-vc-verification-support.md`:
- Line 41: The headings use extra spaces after the '###' marker which violates
MD019; update the two headings "Sequence diagram - validation process" and the
other heading at the second location so the markers have exactly one space
(change '### Sequence diagram - validation process' to '### Sequence diagram -
validation process' and similarly remove the extra space for the other heading)
to satisfy markdownlint.
- Around line 74-97: Update the sequence diagram and narrative so structural and
claims checks are attributed to CwtValidator, not CwtVerifier: have
CwtVerifiableCredential -> CwtValidator: validate CWT (decode hex, check CBOR
Tag 61, validate COSE_Sign1 structure, extract claims/issuer/kid), then on
success call CwtVerifier: verify signature (CoseSign1 + resolved public key via
PublicKeyResolverFactory) and return true/false; remove steps in the diagram
that show CwtVerifier re-validating structure or extracting claims and update
any accompanying text to state that CwtValidator.validate() does
structure/claims validation and CwtVerifier.verify() only performs signature
verification.
Signed-off-by: jaswanthkumarpolisetty <jaswanthkumar.p@thoughtworks.com>
Signed-off-by: jaswanthkumarpolisetty <jaswanthkumar.p@thoughtworks.com>
… com.upokecenter.cbor Signed-off-by: jaswanthkumarpolisetty <jaswanthkumar.p@thoughtworks.com>
Signed-off-by: jaswanthkumarpolisetty <jaswanthkumar.p@thoughtworks.com>
Signed-off-by: jaswanthkumarpolisetty <jaswanthkumar.p@thoughtworks.com>
Signed-off-by: jaswanthkumarpolisetty <jaswanthkumar.p@thoughtworks.com>
Signed-off-by: jaswanthkumarpolisetty <jaswanthkumar.p@thoughtworks.com>
Summary by CodeRabbit