Skip to content

Conversation

@AngelCastilloB
Copy link
Member

It looks like the author meant to do:

if(reader.peek() === UNSIGNED_INT) { reader.readUInt() }

instead of

if(reader.peek() === UNSIGNED_INT) { reader.readInt() }

@AngelCastilloB AngelCastilloB force-pushed the feat/lw-11065-take-over-external-contribution branch 2 times, most recently from c726d0f to 79deb69 Compare September 23, 2024 03:00
@AngelCastilloB AngelCastilloB force-pushed the feat/lw-11065-take-over-external-contribution branch from 79deb69 to d394341 Compare September 23, 2024 03:02
Copy link
Member

@rhyslbw rhyslbw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

image

@AngelCastilloB AngelCastilloB merged commit a8e5cb2 into master Sep 23, 2024
4 of 5 checks passed
@AngelCastilloB AngelCastilloB deleted the feat/lw-11065-take-over-external-contribution branch September 23, 2024 05:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants