Skip to content

[SYCL] Allow __glibcxx_assert_fail in SemaSYCL #18856

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: sycl
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jinge90
Copy link
Contributor

@jinge90 jinge90 commented Jun 9, 2025

GCC-15 introduced __glibcxx_assert_fail function used in -O0 for many STL functions' runtime check. Its behavior is similar to normal 'assert', so we have supported it in libdevice in the same way as 'assert'. However, compfail will happen in some scenario reporting "undefined function without SYCL_EXTERNAL" error for "__glibcxx_assert_fail" declared in c++config.h, we have to allow this as exception in SemaSYCL.

@jinge90 jinge90 requested a review from a team as a code owner June 9, 2025 06:14
@jinge90 jinge90 marked this pull request as draft June 9, 2025 06:14
@jinge90 jinge90 temporarily deployed to WindowsCILock June 9, 2025 06:14 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@jinge90 jinge90 temporarily deployed to WindowsCILock June 9, 2025 06:44 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@jinge90 jinge90 temporarily deployed to WindowsCILock June 9, 2025 06:44 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@jinge90 jinge90 temporarily deployed to WindowsCILock June 9, 2025 06:58 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@jinge90 jinge90 marked this pull request as ready for review June 9, 2025 07:13
Signed-off-by: jinge90 <[email protected]>
@jinge90 jinge90 temporarily deployed to WindowsCILock June 9, 2025 07:29 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@jinge90 jinge90 temporarily deployed to WindowsCILock June 9, 2025 07:29 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
Comment on lines +615 to +626
if (IsAllowed)
return true;

// GCC-15 introduced "std::__glibcxx_assert_fail" declared c++config.h and
// extensively used in STL to do runtime check in debug mode. The behavior
// is similar to "assert", we have supported it in libdevice in the same way
// as "assert". However, Sema check will report "undefined function without
// SYCL_EXTERNAL attribute" error in some cases. We have to allow it just as
// what we did to "__failed_assertion". The prototype is following:
// void __glibcxx_assert_fail(const char *, int, const char *, const char*);
IsAllowed = (Callee->getName() == GlibcxxAssertFail) &&
Callee->getNumParams() == 4 &&
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
if (IsAllowed)
return true;
// GCC-15 introduced "std::__glibcxx_assert_fail" declared c++config.h and
// extensively used in STL to do runtime check in debug mode. The behavior
// is similar to "assert", we have supported it in libdevice in the same way
// as "assert". However, Sema check will report "undefined function without
// SYCL_EXTERNAL attribute" error in some cases. We have to allow it just as
// what we did to "__failed_assertion". The prototype is following:
// void __glibcxx_assert_fail(const char *, int, const char *, const char*);
IsAllowed = (Callee->getName() == GlibcxxAssertFail) &&
Callee->getNumParams() == 4 &&
// GCC-15 introduced "std::__glibcxx_assert_fail" declared c++config.h and
// extensively used in STL to do runtime check in debug mode. The behavior
// is similar to "assert", we have supported it in libdevice in the same way
// as "assert". However, Sema check will report "undefined function without
// SYCL_EXTERNAL attribute" error in some cases. We have to allow it just as
// what we did to "__failed_assertion". The prototype is following:
// void __glibcxx_assert_fail(const char *, int, const char *, const char*);
IsAllowed = IsAllowed || (Callee->getName() == GlibcxxAssertFail) &&
Callee->getNumParams() == 4 &&

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a nit.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants