Skip to content

Attention sink support #533

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Attention sink support #533

wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

kareemshaik80
Copy link

  • Support for single sink logit in flash attention Decode
  • Add Sink to Softmax
  • Cmd line flag added to enable attention sink

@kareemshaik80
Attention sink support
1f0d33a 
 - Support for single sink logit in flash attention Decode
 - Add Sink to Softmax
 - Cmd line flag added to enable attention sink

Signed-off-by: kareem <[email protected]>
@kareemshaik80 kareemshaik80 marked this pull request as draft September 25, 2025 07:38
@kareemshaik80 kareemshaik80 marked this pull request as ready for review September 25, 2025 07:39
yuankuns
yuankuns suggested changes Sep 25, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@yuankuns yuankuns left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also need paper/code reference to ensure this PR is what intended to do

yuankuns
yuankuns reviewed Sep 26, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@yuankuns yuankuns left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not changed

@kareemshaik80
Copy link
Author

Also need paper/code reference to ensure this PR is what intended to do

you can refer this: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2309.17453

eager code: https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/blob/caa14e7dabb086f167c14b7eecadc2ba9db25eb6/src/transformers/models/gpt_oss/modeling_gpt_oss.py#L258

@kareemshaik80 kareemshaik80 requested a review from yuankuns October 7, 2025 04:01
kareemshaik80
kareemshaik80 commented Oct 7, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Author

@kareemshaik80 kareemshaik80 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Move test under unit tests.

yuankuns
yuankuns suggested changes Oct 13, 2025
View reviewed changes
@Antonyvance
Copy link

@kareemshaik80 I believe this implementation need to change based on this PR 547

@Antonyvance Antonyvance added the redesign required Implementation require a redesign label Oct 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@jayachandranb-ai jayachandranb-ai Awaiting requested review from jayachandranb-ai

@yuankuns yuankuns Awaiting requested review from yuankuns

@bhargaveede bhargaveede Awaiting requested review from bhargaveede

At least 2 approving reviews are required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

redesign required Implementation require a redesign

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@kareemshaik80 @Antonyvance @bhargaveede @jayachandranb-ai @yuankuns