Add a new FAQ for converting checkpoints to diffusers #6736
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
lstein
requested review from
blessedcoolant and
hipsterusername
as code owners
hipsterusername
approved these changes
Aug 10, 2024
hipsterusername
force-pushed
the
lstein/docs/add-conversion-faq
branch
from
cb9ac83 to
be48323
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Since migrating from the conversion cache to single-file loading, some users have experienced issues relating to the RAM usage spike when large checkpoint files are loaded. This PR adds a new item to the FAQ explaining what causes this problem and showing how to solve it by converting the checkpoint into a diffusers model.
Related Issues / Discussions
QA Instructions
Check that the rendered documentation looks and reads ok.
Merge Plan
Merge when approved.
Checklist