docs(readme): reframe 'Why this exists' around consumer hardware + offline

[jaylfc]

Summary

• Replaces the library/librarian narrative in the 'Why this exists' section with a direct statement of who the project is for
• Four target audiences: modest-hardware users, distributed-small-machines users (taOS cluster), offline/air-gapped, zero-loss/archival-first
• Preserves the architectural point (verbatim archive first, summaries on top) as a bullet
• Adds the load-bearing fact that the 97% was measured on the Pi stack, not on a hosted model

Not changing

• Benchmark numbers, tables, or harnesses
• Architecture / install / API sections
• The docs/benchmarks.md comparison (from PR docs(readme): neutral reframe — drop competitor editorial, move comparisons to docs/benchmarks.md #38)

Test plan

• README renders cleanly on GitHub
• No orphaned references to "the librarian" / "the library" in the rest of the main README (Architecture section's Librarian Layer heading is a component name and is untouched)

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated project description to emphasize compatibility with modest hardware, multi-node distribution, and offline scenarios
  • Added hardware performance measurement (97.0% on Orange Pi 5 Plus)
  • Clarified zero cloud dependencies and zero API key requirements

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 040eb3a3-a9c8-4b81-abf1-ec5f76415369

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 04b01ca and 540b11f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

README.md updated to replace a library/librarian metaphor narrative with constraint-focused operational scenarios emphasizing offline usage, multi-node distribution, and modest hardware. Added explicit hardware benchmark claim and removed cloud/API dependency language.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
README Documentation README.md	Replaced "Why this exists" narrative framing with constraint-focused bullets highlighting unsuitability of hosted/cloud-model benchmarking. Added hardware measurement claim (97.0% on LongMemEval-S, Orange Pi 5 Plus) and zero cloud/API dependencies statement.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• docs(readme): propagate Judge accuracy framing across all LongMemEval sections #32: Overlapping edits to README metric wording and the 97.0% benchmark phrasing in key features sections.
• docs(readme): neutral reframe — drop competitor editorial, move comparisons to docs/benchmarks.md #38: Modifies README narrative about consolidation/zero-loss archive and benchmarking claims, with additional restructuring moving detailed comparisons into docs/benchmarks.md.

Poem

A rabbit rewrote the tale,
No clouds, no keys, just scales—
On humble Pi, the numbers sing,
Append-only memories wing. 🐇✨

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch docs/readme-hardware-positioning

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}