feat(nix): add comprehensive Nix flake #4826

doprz · 2025-08-15T02:54:47Z

PR Description

This PR adds Nix flake support to provide a reproducible development environment and build process for lazygit contributors, devs, and users.

Features:

Nix Flake Configuration: Complete flake setup supporting multiple architectures
Development Shell: Pre-configured environment with Go toolchain, linting tools, and development utilities
Multiple Entry Points: Support for nix develop, nix run, and nix build

Closes #3474.

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

n/a as this PR doesn't modify go files.

Cheatsheets are up-to-date (run go generate ./...)
Code has been formatted (see here)
Tests have been added/updated (see here for the integration test guide)
Text is internationalised (see here)
If a new UserConfig entry was added, make sure it can be hot-reloaded (see here)
Docs have been updated if necessary
You've read through your own file changes for silly mistakes etc

stefanhaller · 2025-08-17T15:03:30Z

I know next to nothing about Nix, and in particular I don't know what Nix flakes are. I don't really want to spend time on learning more about that, either. However, I would have to understand things a little better in order to judge if the PR is good and can be merged. So what can we do?

I see that our current README.md already says something about flakes (here), but I don't understand what it means. Would this have to be changed with your PR?

Any people reading here who are more familiar with Nix and can help review this?

doprz · 2025-08-19T16:16:31Z

It seems that someone has already uploaded lazygit to nixpkgs which is what your current README.md references.
https://search.nixos.org/packages?channel=25.05&show=lazygit&query=lazygit

I will update the README.md to include information about the local nix flake. In summary this will allow people that use nix to run your project in an ephemeral shell, install it, and even have a fully setup dev env with go and other dependencies managed by nix.

This will be an official flake that is fully featured while the one on nixpkgs is maintained by others and will either follow the 20.05 or unstable channel.

Eveeifyeve

I like what you are doing, but a lot of changes needed.

.gitignore

flake.nix

README.md

doprz · 2025-08-28T16:59:29Z

@Eveeifyeve thank you for the feedback!

stefanhaller · 2025-08-28T17:16:50Z

I really wonder if this thing should be maintained in our repo at all. It sounds similar to an rpm spec file, a deb file, or a homebrew formula, and we don't maintain those here either; we let people who are packaging experts do it wherever it makes sense to them. I'd feel better about this if we took the same approach for this flake thing too. (Happy to link to it from the readme though, of course.)

Or am I missing something about why it conceptionally makes sense to maintain this here, unlike those other ones?

doprz · 2025-08-28T17:44:37Z

The main difference is that this will let developers load up a dev environment provided by nix which includes all the necessary dependencies, env vars, and build tools/checks setup. I've also added the ability to build from source using nix while the unofficial one on nixpkgs is currently pinned at v0.53.0. The nix configuration doesn't require constant maintenance and will only be updated when NixOS reaches a next major version as the packages follow that or lazygit undergoes a major refactor dependent on the go version, build/dev tools, etc... I would be happy to update the nix configuration for lazygit as needed.

Eveeifyeve

Looking good now, but one change needed

flake.nix

Eveeifyeve

Only two more changes needed. Before I consider this LGTM.

flake.nix

doprz · 2025-08-30T22:55:01Z

Thank you for your feedback @Eveeifyeve on this PR! It's been very helpful to learn best practices.

Eveeifyeve

A few nit picks, real issue is the with pkgs.lib else it's LGTM.

flake.nix

doprz · 2025-08-31T03:16:04Z

Thank you @Eveeifyeve!
cc: @stefanhaller This PR is now complete.

Eveeifyeve

doprz · 2025-09-04T15:56:30Z

@stefanhaller bump

stefanhaller

A few things.

The branch is totally unreviewable with all the merges from master, and all the fine-grained commits that change things back and forth. I rebased onto master to get rid of the merge commits and force-pushed, this makes it a little bit reviewable at least. In the end I suppose all commits need to be squashed into one. We don't do this by default here, it's the contributor's job to provide a commit sequence that makes sense. In the future, please look into working with fixup! commits, and never merge master into your branch; always rebase onto master instead.
As for maintaining it here vs. elsewhere: your explanation above still didn't make it very clear to me what the benefit is of maintaining the flake in this repo vs. somewhere else. I now saw that we have an issue for this (#3474), this explains it a little bit better. But still, there are also things like flakehub, would it be an option to use that instead?

The reason why I'm still hesitant to host the flake here is that this PR has shown that it needs expertise to get this right. @Eveeifyeve seems to have done a great job at helping with this, but if they are not around next time we need to make a change to this, who else will be able to do that? I won't, because I totally lack the expertise, and I don't intend to acquire it. @Eveeifyeve What's your take on this?

CONTRIBUTING.md

README.md

flake.nix

Eveeifyeve · 2025-09-05T11:56:17Z

A few things.
* The branch is totally unreviewable with all the merges from master, and all the fine-grained commits that change things back and forth. I rebased onto master to get rid of the merge commits and force-pushed, this makes it a little bit reviewable at least. In the end I suppose all commits need to be squashed into one. We don't do this by default here, it's the contributor's job to provide a commit sequence that makes sense. In the future, please look into working with `fixup!` commits, and never merge master into your branch; always rebase onto master instead.

* As for maintaining it here vs. elsewhere: your explanation above still didn't make it very clear to me what the benefit is of maintaining the flake in this repo vs. somewhere else. I now saw that we have an issue for this (#3474), this explains it a little bit better. But still, there are also things like flakehub, would it be an option to use that instead?
The reason why I'm still hesitant to host the flake here is that this PR has shown that it needs expertise to get this right. @Eveeifyeve seems to have done a great job at helping with this, but if they are not around next time we need to make a change to this, who else will be able to do that? I won't, because I totally lack the expertise, and I don't intend to acquire it. @Eveeifyeve What's your take on this?

I agree to most of this this pr is at the point where you need to squash the commits. Second Maintaining the flake should be left up to the nix contributors and not the main program maintainers it should be in the official repo because packages take a few days before they reach unstable but have a way of getting the package early before unstable releases/updates.

stefanhaller · 2025-09-05T12:12:11Z

it should be in the official repo because packages take a few days before they reach unstable

That alone is not a reason to host them here though, is it? The same can be said about any distribution or package manager. Look at this table, where most table cells need a few days to become green after a new release. We are not going to start hosting deb files, rpm spec files, or homebrew formula files in this repo to avoid that.

Eveeifyeve · 2025-09-05T15:36:39Z

it should be in the official repo because packages take a few days before they reach unstable

That alone is not a reason to host them here though, is it? The same can be said about any distribution or package manager. Look at this table, where most table cells need a few days to become green after a new release. We are not going to start hosting deb files, rpm spec files, or homebrew formula files in this repo to avoid that.

Homebrew it's instant after pr release idk about others probably the same, but nixpkgs you have something called channels (stable and unstable) and channels get merged every couple of days so you have the time of the pr created till merged + time for channels which can equate to about two weeks. Which for many people you don't want to be waiting for the channel to have the change so many people upstream flakes to get the change instantly while also providing a development shell for those who use nix and want to develop they can.

doprz · 2025-09-05T16:13:56Z

This configuration is at the point where it should not require any major changes or foreseeable maintenance to it. The main purpose of this PR was to allow nix users to have a development shell with all of the required deps and tools to start developing and using lazygit. I've also added the ability to build with nix as a nice bonus. I've also squashed the commits + updated the docs as requested.

The original commit I made worked albeit not using best practices as I wasn't aware of things such as flake-compat to offer backwards compatibility to non-flake users. A good example of a project offering nix configuration with a dev environment is ghostty. I'm easily able to clone the repository and have a working zig environment that is reproducible.

The PR is not about replacing the "unofficial" nix flake or adding distribution/package management files to the lazygit repo. It's about allowing nix users to have a declarative and reproducible dev environment to allow them to contribute to lazygit. All they have to do is cd into the repo and load up the dev shell or build lazygit via nix or with make. It's a quality of life PR at it's core.

flake.nix

DeanLemans · 2025-09-19T08:20:10Z

This configuration is at the point where it should not require any major changes or foreseeable maintenance to it. The main purpose of this PR was to allow nix users to have a development shell with all of the required deps and tools to start developing and using lazygit. I've also added the ability to build with nix as a nice bonus. I've also squashed the commits + updated the docs as requested.

The original commit I made worked albeit not using best practices as I wasn't aware of things such as flake-compat to offer backwards compatibility to non-flake users. A good example of a project offering nix configuration with a dev environment is ghostty. I'm easily able to clone the repository and have a working zig environment that is reproducible.
The PR is not about replacing the "unofficial" nix flake or adding distribution/package management files to the lazygit repo. It's about allowing nix users to have a declarative and reproducible dev environment to allow them to contribute to lazygit. All they have to do is cd into the repo and load up the dev shell or build lazygit via nix or with make. It's a quality of life PR at it's core.

so its like a dev container? but for nix users? am i understanding this correctly?

Eveeifyeve · 2025-09-19T09:59:34Z

This configuration is at the point where it should not require any major changes or foreseeable maintenance to it. The main purpose of this PR was to allow nix users to have a development shell with all of the required deps and tools to start developing and using lazygit. I've also added the ability to build with nix as a nice bonus. I've also squashed the commits + updated the docs as requested.
The original commit I made worked albeit not using best practices as I wasn't aware of things such as flake-compat to offer backwards compatibility to non-flake users. A good example of a project offering nix configuration with a dev environment is ghostty. I'm easily able to clone the repository and have a working zig environment that is reproducible.

The PR is not about replacing the "unofficial" nix flake or adding distribution/package management files to the lazygit repo. It's about allowing nix users to have a declarative and reproducible dev environment to allow them to contribute to lazygit. All they have to do is cd into the repo and load up the dev shell or build lazygit via nix or with make. It's a quality of life PR at it's core.

so its like a dev container? but for nix users? am i understanding this correctly?

please just take a look at https://nixos.org

stefanhaller · 2025-09-20T09:44:54Z

@doprz Are you waiting for any more input? I thought there's consensus about the way forward for the two open issues.

doprz · 2025-09-20T16:10:28Z

@doprz Are you waiting for any more input? I thought there's consensus about the way forward for the two open issues.

I've pushed the changes to resolve those two issues and rebased + squashed my commits.

Eveeifyeve · 2025-09-20T21:05:32Z

flake.nix

+            else
+              throw "Could not extract Go version from go.mod";
+
+          go = pkgs."go_${builtins.replaceStrings [ "." ] [ "_" ] goVersion}";


I would move this into an overlay to define go to use the exact version of go. If #4826 (comment) is true

Eveeifyeve · 2025-09-20T21:05:50Z

flake.nix

+            buildInputs = with pkgs; [
+              # Go toolchain
+              go
+              gotools


Does this get the version of go that is packaged via nixpkgs or would this use the local version of go defined above?

This uses the version of go that is defined via the regex.

Yes, but the gotools I know go tools defines a specific version of go inside of its package

What do you suggest?

What do you suggest?

#4826 (comment)

I've also double checked this by running:

nix derivation show .#devShells.<system>.default

and checking inputDrvs.

or

nix derivation show .#devShells.<system>.default | jq '.[].inputDrvs | keys[]' | grep -e "go-.*drv"

doprz · 2025-09-25T21:37:44Z

I've also double checked this by running:
nix derivation show .#devShells.<system>.default
and checking inputDrvs.

or
nix derivation show .#devShells.<system>.default | jq '.[].inputDrvs | keys[]' | grep -e "go-.*drv"

@Eveeifyeve I've addressed all PR comments and feedback and I think that this PR is now ready for a final review before @stefanhaller's review. Thank you once again for all of your help!

stefanhaller · 2025-10-07T13:23:22Z

I rebased on master, cleaned up the commit message of all the squash junk, and added one more fixup commit for the readme.

@Eveeifyeve Is this good to go from your side? I see that @doprz asked you for one final review, but I didn't see any response to that.

Eveeifyeve

Fix some nitpicking. Before it looks good to me.

Eveeifyeve · 2025-10-07T15:41:45Z

.gitignore

+# Ignore build outputs from performing a nix-build or `nix build` command
+result
+result-*
+
+# Ignore automatically generated direnv output
+.direnv
+.envrc


Nit picking, Remove the comments and make a global comment # Nix.

Fixed in 3db5e14

Eveeifyeve · 2025-10-07T15:43:14Z

flake.nix

+        };
+
+      flake = {
+        # Global overlay for other flakes to use


Nix pick, A nix user knows this is an overlay that they could use as it's included as documentation. Please remove.

Removed in 56e7a17

stefanhaller · 2025-10-08T13:05:47Z

Since everything seems addressed now, I'm going to merge this. Thanks again @doprz for the contribution, and @Eveeifyeve for the reviews.

Co-authored-by: Eveeifyeve

minhtrancccp · 2025-10-08T14:02:51Z

i encountered error when nix run is called with the flake
seems like #4844 relates to the error below?

nix log output

> nix log --repair --debug --print-build-logs --verbose -- github:jesseduffield/lazygit |& wl-copy

evaluating file '<nix/derivation-internal.nix>'
evaluating derivation 'github:jesseduffield/lazygit#packages.x86_64-linux.default'...
using cache entry 'file:{"name":"source","store":"/nix/store","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jesseduffield/lazygit/commits/HEAD"}' -> '{"etag":"W/\"8a72f43b339b5f39823e3e3e7ddae4066bc9b407fa09a00674a21978f44dec3c\"","storePath":"c8w5brrgl00jq9gjgvyj8f9i78z52z3m-source","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jesseduffield/lazygit/commits/HEAD"}'
performing daemon worker op: 11
acquiring write lock on '/nix/var/nix/temproots/319196'
performing daemon worker op: 1
using cache entry 'file:{"name":"source","store":"/nix/store","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jesseduffield/lazygit/commits/HEAD"}' -> '{"etag":"W/\"8a72f43b339b5f39823e3e3e7ddae4066bc9b407fa09a00674a21978f44dec3c\"","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jesseduffield/lazygit/commits/HEAD"}', '/nix/store/c8w5brrgl00jq9gjgvyj8f9i78z52z3m-source'
HEAD revision for 'github:jesseduffield/lazygit/HEAD' is 60a7d6ac573fc5e102f5b8975fa9064560f2aee7
using cache entry 'gitRevToTreeHash:{"rev":"60a7d6ac573fc5e102f5b8975fa9064560f2aee7"}' -> '{"treeHash":"fa3e587f81fc897ebf46da7052c1224ca96692d8"}'
using cache entry 'gitRevToLastModified:{"rev":"60a7d6ac573fc5e102f5b8975fa9064560f2aee7"}' -> '{"lastModified":1759929123}'
got tree '«github:jesseduffield/lazygit/60a7d6ac573fc5e102f5b8975fa9064560f2aee7»/' from 'github:jesseduffield/lazygit/60a7d6ac573fc5e102f5b8975fa9064560f2aee7'
evaluating file '«github:jesseduffield/lazygit/60a7d6ac573fc5e102f5b8975fa9064560f2aee7»/flake.nix'
using cache entry 'fetchToStore:{"fingerprint":"60a7d6ac573fc5e102f5b8975fa9064560f2aee7","method":"nar","name":"source","path":"/","store":"/nix/store"}' -> '{"storePath":"p6142g3sm3rvsw0bx345nj2ymy2mp5nh-source"}'
performing daemon worker op: 11
performing daemon worker op: 1
using cache entry 'fetchToStore:{"fingerprint":"60a7d6ac573fc5e102f5b8975fa9064560f2aee7","method":"nar","name":"source","path":"/","store":"/nix/store"}' -> 'null', '/nix/store/p6142g3sm3rvsw0bx345nj2ymy2mp5nh-source'
store path cache hit for '«github:jesseduffield/lazygit/60a7d6ac573fc5e102f5b8975fa9064560f2aee7»/'
performing daemon worker op: 26
evaluating file '/nix/store/p6142g3sm3rvsw0bx345nj2ymy2mp5nh-source/flake.nix'
performing daemon worker op: 19
old lock file: {
  "nodes": {
    "flake-compat": {
      "locked": {
        "lastModified": 1733328505,
        "narHash": "sha256-NeCCThCEP3eCl2l/+27kNNK7QrwZB1IJCrXfrbv5oqU=",
        "rev": "ff81ac966bb2cae68946d5ed5fc4994f96d0ffec",
        "revCount": 69,
        "type": "tarball",
        "url": "https://api.flakehub.com/f/pinned/edolstra/flake-compat/1.1.0/01948eb7-9cba-704f-bbf3-3fa956735b52/source.tar.gz"
      },
      "original": {
        "type": "tarball",
        "url": "https://flakehub.com/f/edolstra/flake-compat/1.tar.gz"
      }
    },
    "flake-parts": {
      "inputs": {
        "nixpkgs-lib": "nixpkgs-lib"
      },
      "locked": {
        "lastModified": 1754487366,
        "narHash": "sha256-pHYj8gUBapuUzKV/kN/tR3Zvqc7o6gdFB9XKXIp1SQ8=",
        "owner": "hercules-ci",
        "repo": "flake-parts",
        "rev": "af66ad14b28a127c5c0f3bbb298218fc63528a18",
        "type": "github"
      },
      "original": {
        "owner": "hercules-ci",
        "repo": "flake-parts",
        "type": "github"
      }
    },
    "nixpkgs": {
      "locked": {
        "lastModified": 1756217674,
        "narHash": "sha256-TH1SfSP523QI7kcPiNtMAEuwZR3Jdz0MCDXPs7TS8uo=",
        "owner": "NixOS",
        "repo": "nixpkgs",
        "rev": "4e7667a90c167f7a81d906e5a75cba4ad8bee620",
        "type": "github"
      },
      "original": {
        "owner": "NixOS",
        "ref": "nixos-25.05",
        "repo": "nixpkgs",
        "type": "github"
      }
    },
    "nixpkgs-lib": {
      "locked": {
        "lastModified": 1753579242,
        "narHash": "sha256-zvaMGVn14/Zz8hnp4VWT9xVnhc8vuL3TStRqwk22biA=",
        "owner": "nix-community",
        "repo": "nixpkgs.lib",
        "rev": "0f36c44e01a6129be94e3ade315a5883f0228a6e",
        "type": "github"
      },
      "original": {
        "owner": "nix-community",
        "repo": "nixpkgs.lib",
        "type": "github"
      }
    },
    "nixpkgs_2": {
      "locked": {
        "lastModified": 1754340878,
        "narHash": "sha256-lgmUyVQL9tSnvvIvBp7x1euhkkCho7n3TMzgjdvgPoU=",
        "owner": "nixos",
        "repo": "nixpkgs",
        "rev": "cab778239e705082fe97bb4990e0d24c50924c04",
        "type": "github"
      },
      "original": {
        "owner": "nixos",
        "ref": "nixpkgs-unstable",
        "repo": "nixpkgs",
        "type": "github"
      }
    },
    "root": {
      "inputs": {
        "flake-compat": "flake-compat",
        "flake-parts": "flake-parts",
        "nixpkgs": "nixpkgs",
        "systems": "systems",
        "treefmt-nix": "treefmt-nix"
      }
    },
    "systems": {
      "locked": {
        "lastModified": 1681028828,
        "narHash": "sha256-Vy1rq5AaRuLzOxct8nz4T6wlgyUR7zLU309k9mBC768=",
        "owner": "nix-systems",
        "repo": "default",
        "rev": "da67096a3b9bf56a91d16901293e51ba5b49a27e",
        "type": "github"
      },
      "original": {
        "owner": "nix-systems",
        "repo": "default",
        "type": "github"
      }
    },
    "treefmt-nix": {
      "inputs": {
        "nixpkgs": "nixpkgs_2"
      },
      "locked": {
        "lastModified": 1755934250,
        "narHash": "sha256-CsDojnMgYsfshQw3t4zjRUkmMmUdZGthl16bXVWgRYU=",
        "owner": "numtide",
        "repo": "treefmt-nix",
        "rev": "74e1a52d5bd9430312f8d1b8b0354c92c17453e5",
        "type": "github"
      },
      "original": {
        "owner": "numtide",
        "repo": "treefmt-nix",
        "type": "github"
      }
    }
  },
  "root": "root",
  "version": 7
}
computing lock file node ''
computing input 'flake-compat'
keeping existing input 'flake-compat'
computing lock file node 'flake-compat'
computing input 'flake-parts'
keeping existing input 'flake-parts'
computing lock file node 'flake-parts'
computing input 'flake-parts/nixpkgs-lib'
keeping existing input 'flake-parts/nixpkgs-lib'
computing lock file node 'flake-parts/nixpkgs-lib'
computing input 'nixpkgs'
keeping existing input 'nixpkgs'
computing lock file node 'nixpkgs'
computing input 'systems'
keeping existing input 'systems'
computing lock file node 'systems'
computing input 'treefmt-nix'
keeping existing input 'treefmt-nix'
computing lock file node 'treefmt-nix'
computing input 'treefmt-nix/nixpkgs'
keeping existing input 'treefmt-nix/nixpkgs'
computing lock file node 'treefmt-nix/nixpkgs'
new lock file: {
  "nodes": {
    "flake-compat": {
      "locked": {
        "lastModified": 1733328505,
        "narHash": "sha256-NeCCThCEP3eCl2l/+27kNNK7QrwZB1IJCrXfrbv5oqU=",
        "rev": "ff81ac966bb2cae68946d5ed5fc4994f96d0ffec",
        "revCount": 69,
        "type": "tarball",
        "url": "https://api.flakehub.com/f/pinned/edolstra/flake-compat/1.1.0/01948eb7-9cba-704f-bbf3-3fa956735b52/source.tar.gz"
      },
      "original": {
        "type": "tarball",
        "url": "https://flakehub.com/f/edolstra/flake-compat/1.tar.gz"
      }
    },
    "flake-parts": {
      "inputs": {
        "nixpkgs-lib": "nixpkgs-lib"
      },
      "locked": {
        "lastModified": 1754487366,
        "narHash": "sha256-pHYj8gUBapuUzKV/kN/tR3Zvqc7o6gdFB9XKXIp1SQ8=",
        "owner": "hercules-ci",
        "repo": "flake-parts",
        "rev": "af66ad14b28a127c5c0f3bbb298218fc63528a18",
        "type": "github"
      },
      "original": {
        "owner": "hercules-ci",
        "repo": "flake-parts",
        "type": "github"
      }
    },
    "nixpkgs": {
      "locked": {
        "lastModified": 1756217674,
        "narHash": "sha256-TH1SfSP523QI7kcPiNtMAEuwZR3Jdz0MCDXPs7TS8uo=",
        "owner": "NixOS",
        "repo": "nixpkgs",
        "rev": "4e7667a90c167f7a81d906e5a75cba4ad8bee620",
        "type": "github"
      },
      "original": {
        "owner": "NixOS",
        "ref": "nixos-25.05",
        "repo": "nixpkgs",
        "type": "github"
      }
    },
    "nixpkgs-lib": {
      "locked": {
        "lastModified": 1753579242,
        "narHash": "sha256-zvaMGVn14/Zz8hnp4VWT9xVnhc8vuL3TStRqwk22biA=",
        "owner": "nix-community",
        "repo": "nixpkgs.lib",
        "rev": "0f36c44e01a6129be94e3ade315a5883f0228a6e",
        "type": "github"
      },
      "original": {
        "owner": "nix-community",
        "repo": "nixpkgs.lib",
        "type": "github"
      }
    },
    "nixpkgs_2": {
      "locked": {
        "lastModified": 1754340878,
        "narHash": "sha256-lgmUyVQL9tSnvvIvBp7x1euhkkCho7n3TMzgjdvgPoU=",
        "owner": "nixos",
        "repo": "nixpkgs",
        "rev": "cab778239e705082fe97bb4990e0d24c50924c04",
        "type": "github"
      },
      "original": {
        "owner": "nixos",
        "ref": "nixpkgs-unstable",
        "repo": "nixpkgs",
        "type": "github"
      }
    },
    "root": {
      "inputs": {
        "flake-compat": "flake-compat",
        "flake-parts": "flake-parts",
        "nixpkgs": "nixpkgs",
        "systems": "systems",
        "treefmt-nix": "treefmt-nix"
      }
    },
    "systems": {
      "locked": {
        "lastModified": 1681028828,
        "narHash": "sha256-Vy1rq5AaRuLzOxct8nz4T6wlgyUR7zLU309k9mBC768=",
        "owner": "nix-systems",
        "repo": "default",
        "rev": "da67096a3b9bf56a91d16901293e51ba5b49a27e",
        "type": "github"
      },
      "original": {
        "owner": "nix-systems",
        "repo": "default",
        "type": "github"
      }
    },
    "treefmt-nix": {
      "inputs": {
        "nixpkgs": "nixpkgs_2"
      },
      "locked": {
        "lastModified": 1755934250,
        "narHash": "sha256-CsDojnMgYsfshQw3t4zjRUkmMmUdZGthl16bXVWgRYU=",
        "owner": "numtide",
        "repo": "treefmt-nix",
        "rev": "74e1a52d5bd9430312f8d1b8b0354c92c17453e5",
        "type": "github"
      },
      "original": {
        "owner": "numtide",
        "repo": "treefmt-nix",
        "type": "github"
      }
    }
  },
  "root": "root",
  "version": 7
}
trying flake output attribute 'packages.x86_64-linux.default'
trying flake output attribute 'defaultPackage.x86_64-linux'
using cached attrset attribute ''
using cached string attribute 'packages.x86_64-linux.default.type'
using cached string attribute 'packages.x86_64-linux.default.drvPath'
performing daemon worker op: 1
using cached list of strings attribute 'packages.x86_64-linux.default.meta.outputsToInstall'
got build log for 'github:jesseduffield/lazygit#packages.x86_64-linux.default' from 'daemon'
Running phase: unpackPhase
@nix { "action": "setPhase", "phase": "unpackPhase" }
unpacking source archive /nix/store/j7pdzc5z4xf4yvm10bwn9immcfi6zbhr-p6142g3sm3rvsw0bx345nj2ymy2mp5nh-source
source root is p6142g3sm3rvsw0bx345nj2ymy2mp5nh-source
Running phase: patchPhase
@nix { "action": "setPhase", "phase": "patchPhase" }
Running phase: updateAutotoolsGnuConfigScriptsPhase
@nix { "action": "setPhase", "phase": "updateAutotoolsGnuConfigScriptsPhase" }
Running phase: configurePhase
@nix { "action": "setPhase", "phase": "configurePhase" }
Running phase: buildPhase
@nix { "action": "setPhase", "phase": "buildPhase" }
Building subPackage .
go: go.mod requires go >= 1.25.0 (running go 1.24.5; GOTOOLCHAIN=local)

stefanhaller · 2025-10-08T14:08:52Z

@doprz @Eveeifyeve Can one of you please have a look? We just recently bumped our go requirement to 1.25. I was assuming that this goVersion overlay thing would take care of this?

doprz · 2025-10-08T16:41:34Z

@stefanhaller A bit of oversight on our end. I've resolved this in #4948.

doprz · 2025-10-08T16:41:57Z

Thank you once again @Eveeifyeve and @stefanhaller for the reviews and feedback!

doprz changed the title ~~feat(nix): add nix flake with dev shell~~ feat(nix): add comprehensive Nix flake Aug 15, 2025

Eveeifyeve suggested changes Aug 28, 2025

View reviewed changes

.gitignore Show resolved Hide resolved

flake.nix Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

flake.nix Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

flake.nix Show resolved Hide resolved

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

doprz requested a review from Eveeifyeve August 28, 2025 22:55

Eveeifyeve suggested changes Aug 29, 2025

View reviewed changes

flake.nix Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

flake.nix Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

doprz requested a review from Eveeifyeve August 29, 2025 17:33

Eveeifyeve reviewed Aug 30, 2025

View reviewed changes

flake.nix Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

Eveeifyeve suggested changes Aug 30, 2025

View reviewed changes

flake.nix Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

flake.nix Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

doprz requested a review from Eveeifyeve August 30, 2025 18:07

Eveeifyeve reviewed Aug 30, 2025

View reviewed changes

flake.nix Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

doprz requested a review from Eveeifyeve August 30, 2025 22:53

Eveeifyeve approved these changes Aug 31, 2025

View reviewed changes

flake.nix Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

flake.nix Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

flake.nix Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

flake.nix Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

Eveeifyeve approved these changes Aug 31, 2025

View reviewed changes

stefanhaller force-pushed the feature/nix-flake branch from 7dc0e36 to e357f68 Compare September 5, 2025 08:08

stefanhaller reviewed Sep 5, 2025

View reviewed changes

CONTRIBUTING.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

flake.nix Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

doprz force-pushed the feature/nix-flake branch from 2f2e918 to 293b5a7 Compare September 5, 2025 15:49

doprz force-pushed the feature/nix-flake branch from 293b5a7 to 516faea Compare September 5, 2025 17:08

stefanhaller reviewed Sep 5, 2025

View reviewed changes

flake.nix Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

doprz force-pushed the feature/nix-flake branch from 516faea to 2dbbe4f Compare September 20, 2025 16:07

doprz requested review from Eveeifyeve and stefanhaller September 20, 2025 16:08

Eveeifyeve reviewed Sep 20, 2025

View reviewed changes

doprz force-pushed the feature/nix-flake branch from 823f775 to f8ad5fc Compare September 25, 2025 21:25

doprz requested a review from Eveeifyeve September 25, 2025 21:26

doprz force-pushed the feature/nix-flake branch 2 times, most recently from a8e9968 to 642bb9b Compare September 25, 2025 21:28

stefanhaller force-pushed the feature/nix-flake branch from 642bb9b to bae4aac Compare October 7, 2025 13:20

stefanhaller added the maintenance For refactorings, CI changes, tests, version bumping, etc label Oct 7, 2025

Eveeifyeve suggested changes Oct 7, 2025

View reviewed changes

feat(nix): add comprehensive nix flake

6b8853c

Co-authored-by: Eveeifyeve

stefanhaller force-pushed the feature/nix-flake branch from 56e7a17 to 6b8853c Compare October 8, 2025 13:06

stefanhaller enabled auto-merge October 8, 2025 13:06

stefanhaller merged commit 6478bf4 into jesseduffield:master Oct 8, 2025
12 checks passed

doprz deleted the feature/nix-flake branch October 8, 2025 16:29

doprz mentioned this pull request Oct 8, 2025

Nix flake broken by Go 1.25 #4947

Open

Uh oh!

feat(nix): add comprehensive Nix flake #4826

feat(nix): add comprehensive Nix flake #4826

Conversation

doprz commented Aug 15, 2025 • edited by stefanhaller Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Description

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

Uh oh!

stefanhaller commented Aug 17, 2025

Uh oh!

doprz commented Aug 19, 2025

Uh oh!

Eveeifyeve left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

doprz commented Aug 28, 2025

Uh oh!

stefanhaller commented Aug 28, 2025

Uh oh!

doprz commented Aug 28, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Eveeifyeve left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Eveeifyeve left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

doprz commented Aug 30, 2025

Uh oh!

Eveeifyeve left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

doprz commented Aug 31, 2025

Uh oh!

Eveeifyeve left a comment • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

doprz commented Sep 4, 2025

Uh oh!

stefanhaller left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Eveeifyeve commented Sep 5, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

stefanhaller commented Sep 5, 2025

Uh oh!

Eveeifyeve commented Sep 5, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

doprz commented Sep 5, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

DeanLemans commented Sep 19, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Eveeifyeve commented Sep 19, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

doprz commented Aug 15, 2025 •

edited by stefanhaller

Loading

doprz commented Aug 28, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Eveeifyeve left a comment •

edited

Loading

Eveeifyeve commented Sep 5, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Eveeifyeve commented Sep 5, 2025 •

edited

Loading

DeanLemans commented Sep 19, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Eveeifyeve commented Sep 19, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Eveeifyeve Sep 20, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Eveeifyeve Oct 7, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Eveeifyeve Oct 7, 2025 •

edited

Loading

minhtrancccp commented Oct 8, 2025 •

edited

Loading