⚡ Verify AStar visited set Contains check complexity - #155
Conversation
Co-authored-by: johnstrand <11484777+johnstrand@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
💡 What: Added AStarBenchmarks to the benchmark suite and verified that _visited in AStar is already a HashSet, providing O(1) Contains lookups.
🎯 Why: The issue hypothesized an O(N) lookup for _visited.Contains(neighbor), but code analysis confirmed _visited is declared as HashSet _visited = [], which already performs O(1) lookups.
📊 Measured Improvement: Verified that _visited is already a HashSet with O(1) Contains lookups. Added AStarBenchmarks to benchmark pathfinding operations.
PR created automatically by Jules for task 13873159358295831929 started by @johnstrand