Skip to content

feat [docs]: Add More Glossary Terms to Testing Glossary Page #570

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Kunal-Darekar
Copy link

@Kunal-Darekar Kunal-Darekar commented Jun 18, 2025

Overview

This PR enhances the Testing Glossary Page as described in issue #2770. The main improvements are:

  • Added an interactive modal for glossary terms, allowing users to view definitions without leaving the page.
  • Fixed a typo in the "Stubs" glossary entry (inklink).

What’s Changed

1. Interactive Modal for Glossary Terms

  • Feature: Clicking any glossary card now opens a modal displaying:
    • The term’s name
    • The full description/definition
    • A “Read more” button that links to the detailed page (opens in a new tab)
  • Benefit: Users can quickly view definitions in context, improving the glossary’s usability and accessibility.

2. Data Consistency

  • Fixed a typo in the "Stubs" entry in static/data/glossaryEntries.js (inklink).

Implementation Notes

  • The modal is accessible and can be closed by clicking outside or using the close button.
  • The alphabetical structure and consistent styling are preserved.
  • No breaking changes; all previous glossary features remain intact.

Screenshots

Screenshot (97)
Screenshot (98)

Related Issue

close #2770

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you and congratulations 🎉 for opening your very first pull request in keploy

@pratik-mahalle
Copy link

Hey @Kunal-Darekar, Thank you for raising the pr. Our team will review the changes before that please make sure to sign the DCO

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants