-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
Update actor_critic_cartpole.py #2155
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
a fix for a value error
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @lmntrx-sys, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request updates the actor_critic_cartpole.py
example script to address a ValueError
by migrating to the gymnasium
library and adapting to its API changes. It also aligns tensor operations to directly use TensorFlow functions when TensorFlow is the Keras backend, ensuring the example remains functional and compatible with current library versions.
Highlights
- Library Migration: Updated the example script to use
gymnasium
instead of the oldergym
library, ensuring compatibility with the latest environment APIs. - API Adaptation: Modified the handling of the
env.reset()
return value on line 101 to correctly unpack the observation (obs, _ = env.reset()
), aligning with thegymnasium
API which returns a tuple of(observation, info)
. - Tensor Operation Alignment: Switched from
keras.ops
to directtensorflow
tensor operations (tf.convert_to_tensor
andtf.expand_dims
) on lines 106 and 107, streamlining the code when TensorFlow is configured as the Keras backend.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request updates the gym
dependency to gymnasium
and attempts to fix a value error. While the dependency update is correct, the implementation change introduces a critical bug by using an uninitialized variable. My review identifies this bug and suggests a fix. Additionally, I've pointed out an inconsistency where keras.ops
was replaced with direct TensorFlow calls, making the code backend-specific, and I've recommended reverting to keras.ops
for consistency, as the original error may have been a side effect of the other bug.
|
||
while True: # Run until solved | ||
state = env.reset()[0] | ||
obs, _ = env.reset() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The env.reset()
call now returns the observation into the obs
variable, but the rest of the loop expects this value to be in the state
variable. This will cause a NameError
on line 106 when state
is used before it's assigned a value. To fix this, the observation should be assigned to state
.
obs, _ = env.reset() | |
state, _ = env.reset() |
state = tf.convert_to_tensor(state) | ||
state = tf.expand_dims(state, 0) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This change replaces keras.ops
with direct tf
calls. This makes the code backend-specific and inconsistent with other parts of the script that use keras.ops
(e.g., lines 116 and 160). For Keras examples, it's best practice to use the backend-agnostic keras.ops
API where possible.
The ValueError
mentioned in the PR description might have been a symptom of the uninitialized state
variable, which is addressed in another comment. After fixing that issue, keras.ops
should be used here for consistency.
state = tf.convert_to_tensor(state) | |
state = tf.expand_dims(state, 0) | |
state = ops.convert_to_tensor(state) | |
state = ops.expand_dims(state, 0) |
a fix for a value error