-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 147
bpf: Fix tnum_overlap to check for zero mask first #10103
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Upstream branch: e758657 |
ecdeefe to
10ce4bd
Compare
|
Upstream branch: ff88079 |
b7b7c66 to
34839bb
Compare
10ce4bd to
e5828a2
Compare
|
Upstream branch: f9db3a3 |
34839bb to
3ce5d4c
Compare
e5828a2 to
13927c8
Compare
|
Upstream branch: 8842732 |
3ce5d4c to
a4d4eed
Compare
13927c8 to
9b73883
Compare
|
Upstream branch: 23f852d |
a4d4eed to
76a70df
Compare
9b73883 to
3cfe497
Compare
|
Upstream branch: 54c134f |
76a70df to
7da51eb
Compare
3cfe497 to
6d6792d
Compare
|
Upstream branch: 9f317bd |
7da51eb to
50176c7
Compare
6d6792d to
4481a85
Compare
|
Upstream branch: 54c134f |
Syzbot reported a kernel warning due to a range invariant violation in the BPF verifier. The issue occurs when tnum_overlap() fails to detect that two tnums don't have any overlapping bits. The problematic BPF program: 0: call bpf_get_prandom_u32 1: r6 = r0 2: r6 &= 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF0 3: r7 = r0 4: r7 &= 0x07 5: r7 -= 0xFF 6: if r6 == r7 goto <exit> After instruction 5, R7 has the range: R7: u64=[0xffffffffffffff01, 0xffffffffffffff08] var_off=(0xffffffffffffff00; 0xf) R6 and R7 don't overlap since they have no agreeing bits. However, is_branch_taken() fails to recognize this, causing the verifier to refine register bounds and end up with inconsistent bounds: 6: if r6 == r7 goto <exit> R6: u64=[0xffffffffffffff01, 0xffffffffffffff00] var_off=(0xffffffffffffff00, 0x0) R7: u64=[0xffffffffffffff01, 0xffffffffffffff00] var_off=(0xffffffffffffff00, 0x0) The root cause is that tnum_overlap() doesn't properly handle the case where the masks have no overlapping bits. Fix this by adding an early check for zero mask intersection in tnum_overlap(). Reported-by: [email protected] Fixes: f41345f ("bpf: Use tnums for JEQ/JNE is_branch_taken logic") Signed-off-by: KaFai Wan <[email protected]>
This patch adds coverage for the warning detected by syzkaller and fixed in the previous patch. Without the previous patch, this test fails with: verifier bug: REG INVARIANTS VIOLATION (true_reg1): range bounds violation u64=[0xffffffffffffff01, 0xffffffffffffff00] s64=[0xffffffffffffff01, 0xffffffffffffff00] u32=[0xffffff01, 0xffffff00] s32=[0xffffff00, 0xffffff00] var_off=(0xffffffffffffff00, 0x0) verifier bug: REG INVARIANTS VIOLATION (true_reg2): range bounds violation u64=[0xffffffffffffff01, 0xffffffffffffff00] s64=[0xffffffffffffff01, 0xffffffffffffff00] u32=[0xffffff01, 0xffffff00] s32=[0xffffff01, 0xffffff00] var_off=(0xffffffffffffff00, 0x0) Signed-off-by: KaFai Wan <[email protected]>
50176c7 to
51ba0cb
Compare
|
At least one diff in series https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=1015928 expired. Closing PR. |
Pull request for series with
subject: bpf: Fix tnum_overlap to check for zero mask first
version: 1
url: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=1015928