Skip to content

Conversation

@kernel-patches-daemon-bpf
Copy link

Pull request for series with
subject: libbpf: fix the incorrect reference to the memlock_rlim variable in the comment.
version: 1
url: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=1016032

@kernel-patches-daemon-bpf
Copy link
Author

Upstream branch: e758657
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=1016032
version: 1

@kernel-patches-daemon-bpf
Copy link
Author

Upstream branch: ff88079
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=1016032
version: 1

@kernel-patches-daemon-bpf
Copy link
Author

Upstream branch: f9db3a3
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=1016032
version: 1

@kernel-patches-daemon-bpf
Copy link
Author

Upstream branch: 8842732
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=1016032
version: 1

@kernel-patches-daemon-bpf
Copy link
Author

Upstream branch: 23f852d
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=1016032
version: 1

…he comment.

The variable "memlock_rlim_max" referenced in the comment does not exist.
I think that the author probably meant the variable "memlock_rlim". So,
correct it.

Signed-off-by: Jianyun Gao <[email protected]>
@kernel-patches-daemon-bpf
Copy link
Author

At least one diff in series https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=1016032 irrelevant now. Closing PR.

@kernel-patches-daemon-bpf kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot deleted the series/1016032=>bpf-next branch October 28, 2025 17:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant