Skip to content

Conversation

@kernel-patches-daemon-bpf
Copy link

Pull request for series with
subject: selftests/bpf: convert test_tc_tunnel.sh to test_progs
version: 3
url: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=1016322

@kernel-patches-daemon-bpf
Copy link
Author

Upstream branch: e758657
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=1016322
version: 3

@kernel-patches-daemon-bpf
Copy link
Author

Upstream branch: ff88079
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=1016322
version: 3

The test_tunnel.c file defines small fonctions to easily attach eBPF
programs to tc hooks, either on egress, ingress or both.

Create a shared helper in network_helpers.c so that other tests can
benefit from it.

Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation) <[email protected]>
…latforms

When trying to run bpf-based encapsulation in a s390x environment, some
parts of test_tc_tunnel.bpf.o do not encapsulate correctly the traffic,
leading to tests failures. Adding some logs shows for example that
packets about to be sent on an interface with the ip6vxlan_eth program
attached do not have the expected value 5 in the ip header ihl field,
and so are ignored by the program.

This phenomenon appears when trying to cross-compile the selftests,
rather than compiling it from a virtualized host: the selftests build
system may then wrongly pick some host headers. If <asm/byteorder.h>
ends up being picked on the host (and if the host has a endianness
different from the target one), it will then expose wrong endianness
defines (e.g __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD instead of __BIT_ENDIAN_BITFIELD),
and it will for example mess up the iphdr structure layout used in the
ebpf program.

To prevent this, directly use the vmlinux.h header generated by the
selftests build system rather than including directly specific kernel
headers. As a consequence, add some missing definitions that are not
exposed by vmlinux.h, and adapt the bitfield manipulations to allow
building and using the program on both types of platforms.

Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation) <[email protected]>
The test_tc_tunnel.sh script checks that a large variety of tunneling
mechanisms handled by the kernel can be handled as well by eBPF
programs. While this test shares similarities with test_tunnel.c (which
is already integrated in test_progs), those are testing slightly
different things:
- test_tunnel.c creates a tunnel interface, and then get and set tunnel
  keys in packet metadata, from BPF programs.
- test_tc_tunnels.sh manually parses/crafts packets content

Bring the tests covered by test_tc_tunnel.sh into the test_progs
framework, by creating a dedicated test_tc_tunnel.sh. This new test
defines a "generic" runner which, for each test configuration:
- will configure the relevant veth pair, each of those isolated in a
  dedicated namespace
- will check that traffic will fail if there is only an encapsulating
  program attached to one veth egress
- will check that traffic succeed if we enable some decapsulation module
  on kernel side
- will check that traffic still succeeds if we replace the kernel
  decapsulation with some eBPF ingress decapsulation.

Example of the new test execution:

  # ./test_progs -a tc_tunnel
  #447/1   tc_tunnel/ipip_none:OK
  #447/2   tc_tunnel/ipip6_none:OK
  #447/3   tc_tunnel/ip6tnl_none:OK
  #447/4   tc_tunnel/sit_none:OK
  #447/5   tc_tunnel/vxlan_eth:OK
  #447/6   tc_tunnel/ip6vxlan_eth:OK
  #447/7   tc_tunnel/gre_none:OK
  #447/8   tc_tunnel/gre_eth:OK
  #447/9   tc_tunnel/gre_mpls:OK
  #447/10  tc_tunnel/ip6gre_none:OK
  #447/11  tc_tunnel/ip6gre_eth:OK
  #447/12  tc_tunnel/ip6gre_mpls:OK
  #447/13  tc_tunnel/udp_none:OK
  #447/14  tc_tunnel/udp_eth:OK
  #447/15  tc_tunnel/udp_mpls:OK
  #447/16  tc_tunnel/ip6udp_none:OK
  #447/17  tc_tunnel/ip6udp_eth:OK
  #447/18  tc_tunnel/ip6udp_mpls:OK
  #447     tc_tunnel:OK
  Summary: 1/18 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation) <[email protected]>
Now that test_tc_tunnel.sh scope has been ported to the test_progs
framework, remove it.

Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation) <[email protected]>
@kernel-patches-daemon-bpf
Copy link
Author

Upstream branch: f9db3a3
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=1016322
version: 3

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant