Conversation
masnwilliams
approved these changes
Aug 27, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Performed full review of 6db7fc9...19f65d7
1 files reviewed | 0 comments | Review on Mesa | Edit Reviewer Settings
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
have a thread going with stainless support where they're aware that this is a bug. Until they fix it, going to patch it
TL;DR
Patched an upstream bug in the
stainlessdependency that was causing issues with file writing.Why we made these changes
This is a temporary workaround for a known bug in
stainless. We're in contact with their support team, who have acknowledged the issue and are working on a fix. This change will be reverted once the upstream dependency is patched.What changed?
Description generated by Mesa. Update settings