Skip to content

Comments

release: 0.12.0#34

Merged
stainless-app[bot] merged 4 commits intomainfrom
release-please--branches--main--changes--next
Sep 30, 2025
Merged

release: 0.12.0#34
stainless-app[bot] merged 4 commits intomainfrom
release-please--branches--main--changes--next

Conversation

@stainless-app
Copy link
Contributor

@stainless-app stainless-app bot commented Sep 30, 2025

Automated Release PR

0.12.0 (2025-09-30)

Full Changelog: v0.11.5...v0.12.0

Features

  • Return proxy ID in browsers response (711c52f)

This pull request is managed by Stainless's GitHub App.

The semver version number is based on included commit messages. Alternatively, you can manually set the version number in the title of this pull request.

For a better experience, it is recommended to use either rebase-merge or squash-merge when merging this pull request.

🔗 Stainless website
📚 Read the docs
🙋 Reach out for help or questions


TL;DR

This release bumps the version to 0.12.0 and adds the proxy_id to the browser response object.

Why we made these changes

Returning the proxy_id allows users to easily identify which proxy is associated with a given browser session. This is useful for logging, debugging, and tracking purposes.

What changed?

  • The browsers API response now includes the proxy_id field.
  • Updated SDK version to 0.12.0.

Validation

  • Confirmed that API calls to the browsers endpoint return the proxy_id.
  • Verified the returned proxy_id is correct for the browser session.

Description generated by Mesa. Update settings

Copy link

@mesa-dot-dev mesa-dot-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Performed full review of d0fc658...1173613

Analysis

  1. Limited scope of proxy ID integration - while the feature adds proxy ID to browser responses, it's unclear if this information is propagated to other related components that might need it
  2. Potential missed opportunity for proxy validation logic - the change only adds the field without apparent validation mechanisms or error handling for proxy failures
  3. Possible dependency on external proxy functionality that isn't explicit in the architecture

Tip

⚡ Quick Actions

This review was generated by Mesa.

Actions:

Slash Commands:

  • /review - Request a full code review
  • /review latest - Review only changes since the last review
  • /describe - Generate PR description. This will update the PR body or issue comment depending on your configuration
  • /help - Get help with Mesa commands and configuration options

6 files reviewed | 0 comments | Review on Mesa | Edit Reviewer Settings

Copy link
Contributor

@sjmiller609 sjmiller609 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@stainless-app stainless-app bot merged commit f826c77 into main Sep 30, 2025
5 checks passed
@stainless-app
Copy link
Contributor Author

stainless-app bot commented Sep 30, 2025

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant