Skip to content

release: 0.13.0#35

Merged
sjmiller609 merged 2 commits intomainfrom
release-please--branches--main--changes--next
Oct 1, 2025
Merged

release: 0.13.0#35
sjmiller609 merged 2 commits intomainfrom
release-please--branches--main--changes--next

Conversation

@stainless-app
Copy link
Contributor

@stainless-app stainless-app bot commented Oct 1, 2025

Automated Release PR

0.13.0 (2025-10-01)

Full Changelog: v0.12.0...v0.13.0

Features

  • Update oAPI and data model for proxy status (87b8365)

This pull request is managed by Stainless's GitHub App.

The semver version number is based on included commit messages. Alternatively, you can manually set the version number in the title of this pull request.

For a better experience, it is recommended to use either rebase-merge or squash-merge when merging this pull request.

🔗 Stainless website
📚 Read the docs
🙋 Reach out for help or questions


TL;DR

This is an automated release for version 0.13.0, which updates the OpenAPI specification and data models for proxy status.

Why we made these changes

This change is part of the regular release process to incorporate the latest features into the SDK. This version specifically adds support for new data related to proxy status.

What changed?

  • Updated the OpenAPI specification and corresponding Go data models to reflect changes in the proxy status API.

Validation

CI checks are expected to pass.

Description generated by Mesa. Update settings

@sjmiller609 sjmiller609 merged commit 0dbee0f into main Oct 1, 2025
5 checks passed
@stainless-app
Copy link
Contributor Author

stainless-app bot commented Oct 1, 2025

Copy link

@mesa-dot-dev mesa-dot-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Performed full review of f826c77...fad580b

Analysis

  1. No validation logic implemented for the new Status enum values or timestamp coherence, potentially allowing inconsistent health status data.

  2. The Status enum uses only binary states ('available'/'unavailable'), missing intermediate states like 'checking' or 'degraded' that would provide more granular health monitoring.

  3. Zero-time LastChecked values are not addressed, which may require special handling to avoid misinterpretation in monitoring contexts.

  4. While backward compatible, the addition of health monitoring introduces new contract implications that may affect how clients interpret and handle proxy responses.

Tip

⚡ Quick Actions

This review was generated by Mesa.

Actions:

Slash Commands:

  • /review - Request a full code review
  • /review latest - Review only changes since the last review
  • /describe - Generate PR description. This will update the PR body or issue comment depending on your configuration
  • /help - Get help with Mesa commands and configuration options

6 files reviewed | 0 comments | Review on Mesa | Edit Reviewer Settings

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant