Skip to content

Comments

release: 0.19.2#46

Merged
stainless-app[bot] merged 2 commits intomainfrom
release-please--branches--main--changes--next
Nov 17, 2025
Merged

release: 0.19.2#46
stainless-app[bot] merged 2 commits intomainfrom
release-please--branches--main--changes--next

Conversation

@stainless-app
Copy link
Contributor

@stainless-app stainless-app bot commented Nov 17, 2025

Automated Release PR

0.19.2 (2025-11-17)

Full Changelog: v0.19.1...v0.19.2

Features

  • Feat increase max timeout to 72h (f824eae)

This pull request is managed by Stainless's GitHub App.

The semver version number is based on included commit messages. Alternatively, you can manually set the version number in the title of this pull request.

For a better experience, it is recommended to use either rebase-merge or squash-merge when merging this pull request.

🔗 Stainless website
📚 Read the docs
🙋 Reach out for help or questions

@mesa-dot-dev
Copy link

mesa-dot-dev bot commented Nov 17, 2025

Mesa Description

Automated Release PR

0.19.2 (2025-11-17)

Full Changelog: v0.19.1...v0.19.2

Features

  • Feat increase max timeout to 72h (f824eae)

This pull request is managed by Stainless's GitHub App.

The semver version number is based on included commit messages. Alternatively, you can manually set the version number in the title of this pull request.

For a better experience, it is recommended to use either rebase-merge or squash-merge when merging this pull request.

🔗 Stainless website
📚 Read the docs
🙋 Reach out for help or questions

Description generated by Mesa. Update settings

Copy link

@mesa-dot-dev mesa-dot-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Performed full review of 791f508...244fc22

Analysis

  1. Missing test coverage for maximum timeout values - current tests only verify the minimum boundary with a 10-second timeout, but no tests verify the new 72-hour maximum limit.

  2. Potential validation inconsistency between client and server - since validation happens server-side, there's a risk that older SDK versions won't properly communicate the new limits to developers.

  3. Integration testing gap - comprehensive server-side integration tests would be needed to verify the 72-hour maximum is properly enforced across the system.

  4. Documentation-only change in the SDK may lead to confusion - developers might assume the client performs validation when it doesn't.

Tip

Help

Slash Commands:

  • /review - Request a full code review
  • /review latest - Review only changes since the last review
  • /describe - Generate PR description. This will update the PR body or issue comment depending on your configuration
  • /help - Get help with Mesa commands and configuration options

6 files reviewed | 0 comments | Edit Agent SettingsRead Docs

@mateoCuervo mateoCuervo changed the title release: 0.20.0 release: 0.19.2 Nov 17, 2025
@stainless-app
Copy link
Contributor Author

stainless-app bot commented Nov 17, 2025

Release version edited manually

The Pull Request version has been manually set to 0.19.2 and will be used for the release.

If you instead want to use the version number 0.20.0 generated from conventional commits, just remove the label autorelease: custom version from this Pull Request.

@stainless-app stainless-app bot force-pushed the release-please--branches--main--changes--next branch from 244fc22 to 008a361 Compare November 17, 2025 14:38
@stainless-app stainless-app bot merged commit 150bcce into main Nov 17, 2025
5 checks passed
@stainless-app
Copy link
Contributor Author

stainless-app bot commented Nov 17, 2025

@mateoCuervo mateoCuervo deleted the release-please--branches--main--changes--next branch November 17, 2025 14:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant