Skip to content

Conversation

cedricchevalier19
Copy link
Member

Should be merged after #91 .

@cedricchevalier19 cedricchevalier19 mentioned this pull request Jun 5, 2024
4 tasks
Kokkos hopefully does not export iostream anymore.
@cedricchevalier19 cedricchevalier19 self-assigned this Jun 14, 2024
@cedricchevalier19 cedricchevalier19 marked this pull request as ready for review June 14, 2024 12:55
Copy link
Contributor

@JBludau JBludau left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would you be fine with splitting it into two, one bumping the version, the other fixing the includes? Just to have a clean history in the repo

@cedricchevalier19
Copy link
Member Author

Would you be fine with splitting it into two, one bumping the version, the other fixing the includes? Just to have a clean history in the repo

The include fix can go first but I do not think it will make a lot of differences on the history side.

Copy link
Contributor

@JBludau JBludau left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess it is fine. But I would love if the title would reflect the fact that missing includes were fixed, too. But no hard feelings about this

@cedricchevalier19 cedricchevalier19 merged commit c68a572 into kokkos:main Jun 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants