docs: update package documentation#177
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 40 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Run ID: ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis PR bumps the package version to 4.2.0, reformats CHANGELOG.md headings consistently, refreshes README documentation with typed callback signatures and new/deprecated API fields, and simplifies the example app's picker configuration and filter logic. Changes4.2.0 Release Update
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~12 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@CHANGELOG.md`:
- Line 81: The changelog entry has the same misspelling in the description text,
so update the affected wording to use separator consistently instead of
seperator. Fix the typo in both occurrences within CHANGELOG.md, keeping the
existing meaning and the showTimeSeparator flag reference unchanged.
- Around line 62-63: The changelog entry contains a misspelling in the
user-facing note, so update the 4.0.0 release item in CHANGELOG.md to correct
the typo in the “seleectedIndex” text. Keep the wording otherwise unchanged and
make sure the entry reads consistently with the intended
“selectedIndex”/“selectedItemIndex” terminology used elsewhere.
- Line 1: The release date for the 4.2.0 entry appears inconsistent with the
following 4.1.1 entry, so update the CHANGELOG release dates to restore
chronological order. Check the 4.2.0 heading and the nearby 4.1.1 section, then
correct whichever date is wrong so the version history is ordered consistently.
In `@pubspec.yaml`:
- Line 4: The version bump in pubspec.yaml is not reflected in the checked-in
example lockfile, so update the example/pubspec.lock entry for bottom_picker to
match 4.2.0. Regenerate or edit the lockfile so the example dependency
resolution stays aligned with the package version update.
In `@README.md`:
- Around line 595-597: The contributors image in the README is missing an alt
attribute, so update the existing contrib.rocks img element in the contributors
section to include descriptive alt text for accessibility. Keep the link and
image source unchanged, and make sure the alt text clearly identifies it as the
contributors image in the README.
- Around line 50-53: Remove the duplicated “### Core Picker Types” subsection
heading in the README so the section appears only once and does not create
duplicate anchors or TOC entries. Update the Markdown around the Core Picker
Types heading to keep a single occurrence and leave the surrounding section
structure unchanged.
- Around line 120-123: The README installation section has a duplicated “## 📦
Installation” heading, which creates duplicate anchors and fails markdown lint.
Remove the extra repeated heading in the README so there is only one
Installation heading, keeping the section content under a single unique heading.
- Around line 364-369: The README docs for buttonBuilder describe the callback
as taking only BuildContext, but the actual BottomPicker.buttonBuilder signature
also passes the BottomPicker instance. Update the callback description to match
the real Widget Function(BottomPicker instance, BuildContext context)? API, and
make sure the surrounding text in the buttonBuilder docs consistently refers to
both parameters.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 72ff48db-1d6e-4255-b612-87e6e0ebbba1
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
CHANGELOG.mdREADME.mdexample/lib/example_widget.dartpubspec.yaml
2aaaac7 to
b97a2e9
Compare
b97a2e9 to
da3185c
Compare
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation