Restrict create/delete verbs on nodes

[johejo]

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

Only few cloud providers actually need those verbs.

• create: kwok
• delete: kwok, huaweicloud

So, it would be better to restrict them to only those providers, following the principle of least privilege.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Special notes for your reviewer:

Related: #5820, #3682

Following scripts were used to find providers using those verbs:

$ rg "Nodes\(\)\.Create" --glob='!*_test.go'
cloudprovider/kwok/kwok_nodegroups.go
84:             _, err := nodeGroup.kubeClient.CoreV1().Nodes().Create(context.Background(), node, v1.CreateOptions{})

$ rg "Nodes\(\)\.Delete" --glob='!*_test.go'
cloudprovider/kwok/kwok_provider.go
163:                    err := kwok.kubeClient.CoreV1().Nodes().Delete(context.Background(), node, v1.DeleteOptions{})

cloudprovider/kwok/kwok_nodegroups.go
118:            err := nodeGroup.kubeClient.CoreV1().Nodes().Delete(context.Background(), node.GetName(), v1.DeleteOptions{})

cloudprovider/huaweicloud/huaweicloud_auto_scaling_group.go
261:            err := kubeClient.CoreV1().Nodes().Delete(context.TODO(), nodeName, metav1.DeleteOptions{})

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:

[k8s-ci-robot]

Welcome @johejo!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes/autoscaler 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes/autoscaler has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @johejo. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: johejo
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign gjtempleton for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• cluster-autoscaler/charts/OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[k8s-ci-robot]

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[jackfrancis]

@johejo sorry for the inconvenience, the cluster-autoscaler charts/ directory has been moved into the cluster-autoscaler/ directory of the repo, so you'll have to rebase these changes on top of a commit that has that restructuing