Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CI action error due to inaccessibility of k8s cluster #68

Closed
alphaX86 opened this issue Nov 3, 2022 · 10 comments · Fixed by #69 or #70
Closed

CI action error due to inaccessibility of k8s cluster #68

alphaX86 opened this issue Nov 3, 2022 · 10 comments · Fixed by #69 or #70
Assignees
Labels
area/lifecycle Lifecycle management (install, uninstall, configure) related area/performance Performance management issue/willfix This issue will be worked on kind/bug Something isn't working

Comments

@alphaX86
Copy link
Member

alphaX86 commented Nov 3, 2022

Description

Meshery SMP Action is failing on some CI runs due to inaccessibility of k8s cluster present in the workflow

Expected Behavior

The error must be rectified and CI run should be free of errors

@alphaX86 alphaX86 added the kind/bug Something isn't working label Nov 3, 2022
@alphaX86 alphaX86 self-assigned this Nov 3, 2022
@alphaX86 alphaX86 added area/lifecycle Lifecycle management (install, uninstall, configure) related area/performance Performance management labels Nov 3, 2022
@alphaX86 alphaX86 changed the title CI action error due to inaccessibility of k8s cluser CI action error due to inaccessibility of k8s cluster Nov 3, 2022
@gyohuangxin
Copy link
Member

@alphaX86 Thank you very much.

@gyohuangxin
Copy link
Member

@gyohuangxin gyohuangxin reopened this Nov 7, 2022
@alphaX86
Copy link
Member Author

alphaX86 commented Nov 7, 2022

From the logs it shows that it didn't have permission to extract files 😭 oh damn.... Should we try an alternative CI function for this? Or shall we wait for subsequent CI action runs to see results?

@gyohuangxin
Copy link
Member

@alphaX86 I give you the maintain access to this repo, you can run a configurable benchmark test on self-hosted runner if it works.

@alphaX86
Copy link
Member Author

alphaX86 commented Nov 7, 2022

👀👀 ok, will do 👍

@gyohuangxin
Copy link
Member

@alphaX86 Do you have any updates?

@alphaX86
Copy link
Member Author

I ran the CI action on the repo and checked. Seems its an error on the permissions for extracting installation files during k8s setup. IDK what exactly causes this. I referred this in net and as per the suggestions I even re-ran the action. No joy :/

Likely we might need to change the k8s action to test it. What's your opinion? @gyohuangxin

@gyohuangxin
Copy link
Member

@alphaX86 Please go ahead, the only difference is the version of manusa/actions-setup-minikube, so IMO maybe you can research what's changeed in the new version.

@alphaX86
Copy link
Member Author

alphaX86 commented Nov 15, 2022

For CIL cluster, seems it's restricted to use actions within it. Similar error is also caused in this repo I saw...
engineerd/setup-kind#13
Seems manual method is the way for solving in case of self-hosted runners :/

NVM, I think I got a mere idea now

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jan 2, 2023

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the issue/stale Issue has not had any activity for an extended period of time label Jan 2, 2023
@alphaX86 alphaX86 added issue/willfix This issue will be worked on and removed issue/stale Issue has not had any activity for an extended period of time labels Jan 3, 2023
@alphaX86 alphaX86 pinned this issue Jan 3, 2023
@alphaX86 alphaX86 unpinned this issue Jan 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/lifecycle Lifecycle management (install, uninstall, configure) related area/performance Performance management issue/willfix This issue will be worked on kind/bug Something isn't working
2 participants