-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix failing k8s action in the workflow #70
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Aadhitya A <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Aadhitya A <[email protected]>
Action is being made to run with simultaneous changes made in this branch. If worked, will ping for review |
Signed-off-by: Aadhitya A <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Aadhitya A <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Aadhitya A <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Aadhitya A <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Aadhitya A <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Aadhitya A <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Aadhitya A <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Aadhitya A <[email protected]>
Can you send the link to a local workflow run? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are 3 different ways we are setting up kubernetes in this PR
manusa/actions-setup-minikube
medyagh/[email protected]
And a manual curl get and install.
What is the problem with each of the methods exactly? Can we not use one method consistently throughout the workflows?
OK so the main issue is present in the self-hosted runner where the k8s Workflow didn't work during setup and the action throws an error saying there's no permission for the action to unzip files during setup. This is why for self-hosted runners alone, I used For normal ones, I just changed them for testing which is reliable. Don't get alarmed 😅 |
All workflows are made to run here itself in this repo under |
@alphaX86 Excellent! It seems your changes to kubernetes worked: https://github.com/layer5io/meshery-smp-action/actions/runs/3472699467/jobs/5803912095, so please revise this PR based on @hershd23 's comments. |
Signed-off-by: Aadhitya A <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Aadhitya A <[email protected]>
|
Signed-off-by: Aadhitya A <[email protected]>
@alphaX86 Hi, do you have any update? |
Uh oh! 🙆♂️ totally forgot this... I'll resume this work on Next week Mon and update you back... Until then, this PR is now a draft |
@alphaX86 Good, it's ok. Thank you! |
Signed-off-by: Aadhitya A <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Aadhitya A <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Aadhitya A <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Aadhitya A <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Aadhitya A <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Aadhitya A <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Aadhitya A <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Aadhitya A <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Aadhitya A <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Aadhitya A <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for continuing to fix this issue, lgtm.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@hershd23 Thanks. |
Description
This PR fixes #68
Notes for Reviewers
WIP and test required
Signed commits