We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hello
I would like to understand why the reads are not(less) mapped in proper pairs when --split-prefix is used ?
with split-prefix (index .mmI < target size) (25% in proper pair) minimap2/2.22 --sam-hit-only -2 -ax sr bqPART.mmI read1 read2 --secondary=yes --split-prefix tmp > map1.sam
minimap2/2.22 --sam-hit-only -2 -ax sr bqPART.mmI read1 read2 --secondary=yes --split-prefix tmp > map1.sam
read1 113 CTG819.1 104 0 101M CTG6.8 AS:i:202 tp:A:P
read2 179 CTG6.8 1106 31 6S34M3D37M2S CTG819.1 AS:i:124 tp:A:P
read1 355 CTG6.8 944 0 101M = AS:i:202 tp:A:S
index .mmI == target size (no split-prefix needed) (85% in proper pair) minimap2 --sam-hit-only -2 -ax sr bqFULL.mmI read1 read2 > map1.sam
minimap2 --sam-hit-only -2 -ax sr bqFULL.mmI read1 read2 > map1.sam
read1 99 CTG6.8 944 26 101M = AS:i:202 tp:A:P
read2 147 CTG6.8 1106 33 6S34M3D37M2S = AS:i:124 tp:A:P
Thank you for your help Corinne
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Hello
I would like to understand why the reads are not(less) mapped in proper pairs when --split-prefix is used ?
with split-prefix (index .mmI < target size) (25% in proper pair)
minimap2/2.22 --sam-hit-only -2 -ax sr bqPART.mmI read1 read2 --secondary=yes --split-prefix tmp > map1.sam
index .mmI == target size (no split-prefix needed) (85% in proper pair)
minimap2 --sam-hit-only -2 -ax sr bqFULL.mmI read1 read2 > map1.sam
Thank you for your help
Corinne
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: