Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(request-response): migrate tests from async-std to tokio #5857

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

shiyasmohd
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Migrating tests in protocols/request-response from async_std to tokio as per #4449

Notes & open questions

Change checklist

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • A changelog entry has been made in the appropriate crates

@shiyasmohd shiyasmohd marked this pull request as draft February 10, 2025 14:35
Copy link
Member

@dariusc93 dariusc93 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Left one minor comment

Comment on lines +15 to +18
cbor4ii = { version = "0.3.2", features = [
"serde1",
"use_std",
], optional = true }
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we revert this and stick with the previous format?

elenaf9
elenaf9 previously approved these changes Feb 11, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@elenaf9 elenaf9 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

Edit: actually, I just saw that the tests now fail. Any idea why?

@elenaf9 elenaf9 dismissed their stale review February 11, 2025 09:30

Tests fail.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants