Skip to content

LCORE-3054: Bump lightspeed-stack CPE to 0.7 [main]#2128

Open
syedriko wants to merge 1 commit into
lightspeed-core:mainfrom
syedriko:syedriko-cpe-0-7
Open

LCORE-3054: Bump lightspeed-stack CPE to 0.7 [main]#2128
syedriko wants to merge 1 commit into
lightspeed-core:mainfrom
syedriko:syedriko-cpe-0-7

Conversation

@syedriko

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Bump lightspeed-stack CPE to 0.7 on the main branch to prevent an EC violation at the time of 0.7.0 release.

Type of change

  • Refactor
  • New feature
  • Bug fix
  • CVE fix
  • Optimization
  • Documentation Update
  • [] Configuration Update
  • Bump-up service version
  • Bump-up dependent library
  • Bump-up library or tool used for development (does not change the final image)
  • CI configuration change
  • Konflux configuration change
  • Unit tests improvement
  • Integration tests improvement
  • End to end tests improvement
  • Benchmarks improvement

Tools used to create PR

Identify any AI code assistants used in this PR (for transparency and review context)

  • Assisted-by: (e.g., Claude, CodeRabbit, Ollama, etc., N/A if not used)
  • Generated by: (e.g., tool name and version; N/A if not used)

Related Tickets & Documents

Checklist before requesting a review

  • I have performed a self-review of my code.
  • PR has passed all pre-merge test jobs.
  • If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.

Testing

  • Please provide detailed steps to perform tests related to this code change.
  • How were the fix/results from this change verified? Please provide relevant screenshots or results.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

Review limit reached

@syedriko, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 49 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 46e24eae-547b-4899-9d40-ff9988605205

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a9e0a01 and a407161.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • deploy/lightspeed-stack/Containerfile
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
✨ Simplify code
  • Create PR with simplified code

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@syedriko syedriko changed the title LCORE-3054: Bump lightspeed-stack CPE to 0.7 on the main branch LCORE-3054: Bump lightspeed-stack CPE to 0.7 [main] Jul 13, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant