Skip to content

Conversation

@dougbrn
Copy link
Collaborator

@dougbrn dougbrn commented Apr 30, 2025

closes #206

@review-notebook-app
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@dougbrn dougbrn changed the title Add About Section Add About Section to docs Apr 30, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 30, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 98.81%. Comparing base (b6412b5) to head (764abc1).
⚠️ Report is 119 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #249   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.81%   98.81%           
=======================================
  Files          14       14           
  Lines        1348     1349    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits         1332     1333    +1     
  Misses         16       16           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 30, 2025

Before [b6412b5] After [72d9617] Ratio Benchmark (Parameter)
10.4±0.2ms 10.5±0.3ms 1.01 benchmarks.NestedFrameAddNested.time_run
11.1±0.06ms 11.2±0.2ms 1.01 benchmarks.NestedFrameQuery.time_run
274M 274M 1 benchmarks.AssignSingleDfToNestedSeries.peakmem_run
97.3M 97.1M 1 benchmarks.NestedFrameAddNested.peakmem_run
101M 102M 1 benchmarks.NestedFrameQuery.peakmem_run
101M 101M 1 benchmarks.NestedFrameReduce.peakmem_run
293M 293M 1 benchmarks.ReassignHalfOfNestedSeries.peakmem_run
25.5±0.7ms 25.1±0.5ms 0.98 benchmarks.AssignSingleDfToNestedSeries.time_run
49.8±2ms 48.9±7ms 0.98 benchmarks.ReassignHalfOfNestedSeries.time_run
1.32±0.01ms 1.26±0.01ms 0.96 benchmarks.NestedFrameReduce.time_run

Click here to view all benchmarks.

@dougbrn dougbrn marked this pull request as ready for review April 30, 2025 19:19
@dougbrn dougbrn requested review from hombit and removed request for hombit April 30, 2025 19:19
Copy link
Collaborator

@hombit hombit left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great improvements, thank you!

@dougbrn dougbrn merged commit efaa27d into main May 5, 2025
11 of 12 checks passed
@dougbrn dougbrn deleted the internals_diagram branch May 5, 2025 20:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add memory representation diagram into the docs

3 participants