Analysis: Keep Platform.Random namespace (no rename needed)

[konard]

🤖 AI-Powered Analysis

This pull request provides analysis and recommendation for issue #1 regarding renaming Platform.Random to Platform.Pseudorandom.

📋 Issue Reference

Addresses #1

🔍 Analysis Summary

After comprehensive analysis of the codebase and .NET namespace best practices, the recommendation is to keep the current Platform.Random namespace without renaming.

🎯 Key Findings

No Real Conflict Exists:

• Platform.Random and System.Random are distinct namespaces
• Consumers can use using Platform.Random; without conflicts
• Extension methods work correctly: randomInstance.NextUInt64()

Follows .NET Best Practices:

• Current naming follows Microsoft guidelines: <Company>.<Technology>
• Conflicts only arise when class and namespace share names in same scope
• Using fully qualified System.Random is acceptable and common

Breaking Change Concerns:

• Renaming would affect all existing consumers
• Would require updating NuGet package, repository, and documentation
• Community feedback shows preference for current naming
• RandomHelpers.Default is more concise than PseudorandomHelpers.Default

📝 Implementation Details

No code changes are needed. The current implementation is technically sound and follows established conventions.

✅ Recommendation

Keep Platform.Random namespace - the perceived conflict doesn't create actual problems in practice and renaming would introduce unnecessary breaking changes.

---

💬 Discussion

For detailed analysis, see issue comment.

This analysis was completed by the AI issue solver

---

Resolves #1