Use safe specialization for C++ functors #80
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This PR implements the requested changes from issue #63 to use safe specialization for C++ functors.
Changes made:
namespace std { ... }syntax with safe template specializationtemplate<...> struct std::hash<Type> { ... }CSharpToCppTransformer.cs) and Python (cs2cpp.py) implementationsBefore (unsafe):
After (safe):
template<...> std::hash<Type<...>> { }Test plan
The safe specialization approach avoids namespace pollution and potential ADL (Argument-Dependent Lookup) issues while maintaining full functionality.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Resolves #63